• EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      7 states require them right now. Thats it. Most are still fighting saying that if the police are on camera they can’t do their job.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not a perfect solution either. There have been plenty of instances where cops “forget to turn on” or “accidently block” their cams. Even cases where, mysteriously, the cams are “accidentally” damaged or the data “corrupted”.

        Unfortunately seems like the only defense for these cases is livestreaming police interactions.

        Cop unions should be illegal. (All other unions are fine)

        • tentphone@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          1 year ago

          Requirements for officers to wear body cameras are meaningless without significant penalties for turning them off when on duty

          • SirNuke@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely, and you can generalize that to any sort of requirements are worthless if they don’t have as much teeth as the power they are trying to check.

      • tox_solid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, when your job is to menace the communities you are supposedly charged with protecting, all that extra attention can really be a bother.

    • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rarely, yes, but the technology to create a body cam that functions reliably when near police officers hasn’t been developed yet.