Parents who shout at their children or call them “stupid” are leaving their offspring at greater risk of self-harm, drug use and ending up in jail, new research claims.

Talking harshly to children should be recognised as a form of abuse because of the huge damage it does, experts say.

The authors of a new study into such behaviour say “adult-to-child perpetration of verbal abuse … is characterised by shouting, yelling, denigrating the child, and verbal threats”.

“These types of adult actions can be as damaging to a child’s development as other currently recognised and forensically established subtypes of mistreatment such as childhood physical and sexual abuse,” the academics say in their paper in the journal Child Abuse & Neglect.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      using equivalency phrases on things that are very much not equivalent. Also scientific studies are great in the hard sciences but in the social sciences become very iffy. Doing some correlation on questionaires is not equivalent to measuring small changes in a large structure to measure gravitational effects.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doing some correlation on questionaires is not equivalent to measuring small changes in a large structure to measure gravitational effects.

        Where did anyone say this? You’re trying to sound knowledgeable about science, but all you’re doing is making up strawmen to argue against over and over

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          its a reply to iamthetots comment about scientific studies. one thing that is frustrating with federation is sometimes folks don’t see all the people or parts of a convo

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            I read that comment, that doesn’t change the fact that you’re creating strawman arguments

            • HubertManne@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              explain strawman argument and how my conversation fits into it because I do not believe my conversation has been one. Or not if you don’t really believe its a strawman argument. Make some other comment if thats the case.