I know a lot of lurkers like me out there are browsing, but there’s quite a bit of engagement capitol on the federated instances. If you find an interesting topic and the right community, you get a lot of feedback. There’s not much hate being thrown out there either.
One of my controversial opinions is beloved TV presenter Stephen Fry has done more harm in last 20years than any other celebrity (including Trump).
QI approach of ‘but akshly’ Clakson and in game punishing people for having interest in topic but not knowing fully lead to confrontational approach to knowledge that led to smug ‘but aksuly’ on one side and pushed those that like to get bits of trivia to share but may not have full knowledge towards the anti-intelectual, fuck experts approach.
Instead if people did the xckd 10000 people approach https://xkcd.com/1053/ and rather than making fun, build up others knowledge and excite them to learn, then maybe they wouldn’t turn their backs on knowing
I agree with your statement totally. But I’m now curious of the nature of your controversial opinion! I know who Stephen Fry is and have a general idea of his work. I’ve seen him in many movies and listened to a few of his shows on the BBC that’s it. But I can’t say I’ve followed him closely at all. How has he done harm? (genuine question promise, I’m definitely interested in knowing another side of him that I hadn’t considered or seen)