• Cethin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to let you know I’m not the one downvoting you. I disagree, but I’m not downvoting.

    Personally, I don’t think The Satanic Temple should be considered a religion. I think the term has been watered down, particularly in the US, because our laws are stupid. As long as there is an incentive to be called a religion it should be, but there shouldn’t be an incentive. Why should anyone’s beliefs be valued more because they’re tied to (usually at least) supernatural beliefs?

    TST was created as religious satire. That’s the reason for the holidays, riguals, and other services. They need to conform to the appearance of a religion to work as a religion for their own purposes. That isn’t to say these are bad or wrong. They’re just as valid as any other religion. It’s just that the belief that it’s founded on is humanism, not something supernatural.

    • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why should anyone’s beliefs be valued more because they’re tied to (usually at least) supernatural beliefs?

      TST agrees with you. In fact, this is almost word-for-word what it says in the FAQ under the question “If you don’t believe in the supernatural, how is TST a religion?”

      TST was created as religious satire. That’s the reason for the holidays, riguals, and other services.

      What convinced you of this?

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I agree with that. It’s religious satire. That’s why I included the parenthesis.