• PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I did state that his argument was not without its flaws. It still serves its purpose as a thought experiment about how a society should handle radically dissenting opinions.

    I won’t pretend to know the answer in practice and censorship makes me uneasy but my debate is against free speech absolutionists.