I encountered someone saying, “I have no problems with a person’s sexual orientation and choice, I have a problem with anyone being openly sexual or flaunting their sexuality in front of me regardless of their choice of orientation.”

I am a card carrying atheist. I was raised in one of the worst fundamental christian extremist groups and now live in near isolation from abandoning it nearly 10 years ago. All sexuality was bottled in my life and surroundings. This is still my comfort zone. A part of me wants to hold on to a similar ethos as the person I mentioned above, but I feel like I’m not very confident it is the right inner philosophical balance either.

I’m partially disabled now, so this is almost completely hypothetical. I am honestly looking to grow in my understanding of personal space and inner morality as it relates to others. Someone enlighten me please. Where does this go, what does it mean to you?

  • RadioRat (he/they)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    For me, a simple, intuitive, and practical way to discuss and evaluate morality is to evaluate net social harm/good.

    The only real social harms that can come from sexual behavior between consenting adults are unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease.