The artist is sleepy_mocha

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Most likely. That’s all stuff at the top. Stuff that’s going to be changed through political action,not any individual action. I was considering as well - corporations also have all of the leverage. They have resources SO VAST that the relative burden of tackling this problem is much smaller for them than it is for us. One company growing a backbone and acting for public good than for pocketbook good would have more impact than a million individuals completely destroying their way of living, and with far less self-harm.

    • Gsus4@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      But corporations don’t have any incentive to do anything that hurts the profits they extract from the 99% (mostly indexed to energy prices, everyone is selling energy directly or indirectly) and politicians at best just do what people vote for (better standard of living, which mostly depends on cheaper energy prices).

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Correct. And individuals alone are mostly useless. So the solution is to form collectives, get all the consumer class, or most of them, aligned, and then we have bargaining power.

        • Gsus4@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It may work if fossil consumers like China, Japan, parts of Africa and South America, India and Europe work together to sustainably penalize and eventually get off fossil fuel dependence, but the fossil fuel exporter cartel will fight this :/

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s going to be a fight regardless. Anything worth doing always is. Can’t shy from it just because they won’t go peacefully.

            • Gsus4@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              It’s not shying from it, many just don’t see a way forward that doesn’t involve a significant risk of massive suffering like starvation, war, authoritarianism if one or two things don’t go exactly as the utopians would expect (like most revolutions).

              This is not a utopian project, this is a “controlled landing” of a large spaceship from a 200-year old addiction to fossil-fueled growth: you need everyone on board and an awareness of the risks by everyone and possibility of relapses, calm and a notion of what is at stake, but there is still a chance that we’ll fuck up, given our history :/

              • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                No one expects utopia. That’s a bit of a false dichotomy. But it doesn’t have to be utopia to be better than we have it now. I totally get not wanting to risk things, but that’s the only way to move forward. You (broadly, not individual you) can either step up, grab the controls, and then at least if you crash, you had agency. We’re flying into the mountain as is, gotta try something.