• ShadowRam@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But isn’t ARM just a hell of a lot better than any of these intel chips?

    Everything I’ve seen that’s small form factor and low power is going ARM, and the list of things not compatible with ARM is getting real small.

    • netwren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Use case for those NUCs wasn’t embedded devices but basically workstations that required nominal resources and no external GPU. Thinnish clients.

      Additionally I like them as a small host able service box. I think they make great mini k8s clusters.

    • RagingToad@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lower power is ARM, but aren’t X86 CPUs not still a lot faster? (While my Raspberry Pi 4 can barely run a Minecraft server, my 50$ SFF can run 2 servers at the same time and still has plenty of CPU cycles left)

      Power consumption is higher ofcourse, but I exchanged 3 Pi’s (3*10W) with one SFF (25W) so it’s fine :-)

      • gramathy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a design consideration, not an actual problem. Remember the pi is also not running natively, and that the quite good M chips from Apple are ARM-based.

        • RagingToad@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t fully understand. What’s the design consideration? My biggest problem is actually that the least power hungry CPU (arm) has very little options if you want to run a server with a bit more processing power.

          If you mean that Minecraft is not native… this is Java , so everything runs in the JVM independent of platform.

          I might need a Mac Mini as a server and install Linux on it (is that still an option?) like some kind of NUC…