One thing I worry about is a contingent presidential election. That situation arises when no candidate gets a majority of electoral votes (270 of 538). Should this situation arise, Congress gets to pick the next president and vice president.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re missing a key part of that process which makes it even more of a shit show. If there is a contingent election, then it is not resolved by a straight vote of 435 House members. Each state’s House delegation gets a vote. So all 52 members from California get the same voting power as Wyoming’s lone rep.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought, surely you must be wrong.

      Nope… You’re right.

      And they can even hold the vote in a closed session.

      wtf

      • ripcord@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One time whose votes count more? Wyoming? They already count more in presidential and Senate elections that californians’