Just checked instances after the hack and noticed that lemmy.world is federated with all of the Lemmygrads. Was it always?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    And I’m saying I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re all rightwingers larping.

    They all think they’re the only ones trolling and everyone else is authentic, when none of them are

    • Luca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Leftists can be fucking insane too, my guy. Lemmygrad is proof of that

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some years ago I read an amusing article about Conservapedia, discussing how half the contributors were genuine right wing lunatics and the other half were trolls pretending to be right wing lunatics and nobody could tell who was what. I suppose it’s possible that Lemmygrad is like that too. But there are definitely genuine lunatics in the mix, regardless.

      • mimic_kry@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        On the one hand, yes, absolutely.

        On the other, tankies are fascists. They just happen to prefer their slaves to be communal, rather than spread out amongst corpos.

        Stalin was a fascist. Being a Stalinist means you’re a fascist. Ergo, tankies are fascists.

        Centralization of power is always bad. Because fascism is always bad. We need to stop looking at bygone eras of centralized power structures and move towards a more federational (federated) power/governance structure.

        Then we need to get rid of the power balance for good. Until then, be weary of communists masquerading under the same flag but pushing for power centralization.

        Communism isn’t a form of governance, our first step should be to mold our democratic republic around it instead of capitalism. Then change it as our needs demand.

        Easier said than done, I realize, but change is possible. Fingers crossed it happens soon. Sorry about the rant.

        • nyar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is very incorrect. Hate Stalin if you want but he wasn’t a fascist.

          • mimic_kry@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sta·lin·ism /ˈstäləˌniz(ə)m/ noun the ideology and policies adopted by Stalin, based on centralization, totalitarianism, and the pursuit of communism.

            Sorry, but it’s true, Stalin was a fascist. Democratic centralization is still power centralization, and runs counter to all of communism’s economic ideologies.

            • nyar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’ve said nothing that actually fits Stalin into any of the many definitions of fascism.

              No reference to Eco, no mention of palingenetic ultranationalism, you could maybe use Gregor to fit your view even though other scholars discount his positions and ideas, but you don’t.

              Even if you used the definition from a man killed as a result of Stalin, Trotsky, you still wouldn’t have a definition that found Stalin to be a fascist.

              Dislike him if you want but use words that actually fit him and what he did. Fascist isn’t it.

              • mimic_kry@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, I didn’t mention them because they’re literal set dressing used by a dictator to convince people he wasn’t one. It’s worse if the man truly thought creating a centralized power structure would be beneficial to Marxist principles, because he himself proved that it can’t work.

                Here’s why: once you establish a centralized power structure, it doesn’t matter how kind or charismatic the person (or small group) in charge is, it is the literal definition of fascism.

                I don’t know how to more clearly put this. Even if I give you the benefit of the doubt, he created a centralized power structure that was immediately corrupted and abused. You’re saying “but look at all this other stuff” like it takes away from the fact that this is fascism.

                What I don’t get how you reconcile communism with totalitarianism (literally fascism with extra steps).

                • Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  once you establish a centralized power structure,… it is the literal definition of fascism.

                  By your definition almost any form of government is fascist. It that’s your opinion, fine, but it’s not the ‘literal definition’.

                  • mimic_kry@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The reason fascism continues to exists is because of people like you giving everything to charismatic conmen. Stalin is dead and you continue to defend him as if he didn’t do what he did. He’s directly responsible for the state of Russia today, and you think that’s somehow a good thing.

                    A power vaccum, like the one Stalin created as a result of his own death, ALWAYS gets filled by a greedy, power hungry asshole. It may take a few iterations, but the outcome is inevitable.

                    I find your (and the literal) definition of fascism to be lacking if it doesnt include Stalin. The charlatan dictator.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmgrad is proof

        That people on social media who claim to be “leftists” say insane shit my guy

        You are aware that people can do that, right?

        Just go on the internet and lie about shit…

        • dlove67@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is your argument that tankies don’t exist? I assure you that they do.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Next thing you know these jaded people are going to tell me it’s not really the cats in pictures asking for cheeseburgers!

        • HipPriest@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are genuine people on the extreme Left who are Stalin apologists, and they are called Tankies. They are a fringe but they’re not trolls, they believe it

    • eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’re overthinking it, tankies absolutely do exist and have since stalin’s death, the term was coined by a communist reffering to more extreme members of their own party. If this is your first time running into them I honestly envy that.