- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Many of these are barely games at all, but they’re marketed as such so into the games section this goes. 
Many of these are barely games at all, but they’re marketed as such so into the games section this goes.
as a first-order cause we didn’t have a choice.
at the root, too many of y’all bought horse armor instead of becoming communists.
Placing the blame primarily on individual consumer choices is a
take and the sense of lofty superiority you might feel from that take is also a form of liberalism.
yeah but gamers tho
You have a point.
ii said it wasn’t our choice
if “the market” had magically rejected horse armor they would’ve had to find different ways to be horrible
That’s a non-provable negative and claiming that absolutely everything would be exactly the same is just a call for apathy and I reject it.
bruh i don’t think i need to prove that capitalist business guys would find some different way to be horrible
Bruh peddling inevitabilism and allowing bad people to be bad however they please is not exactly a leftist take.
is not something i did
is also not something i did
is not something i proposed or implied
I’m not sure who you’re talking to but for a portion of each of your replies in this thread it seems to not be to me.
have a nice day.
There aren’t many other ways to interpret saying that, or its intent in being said. Dodge around all you like, but if all you have to say is disavowals of interpretation over and over again, then you effectively said nothing at all, which is fine by me because your apathy statement was worthless from the start.
No, I let this happen. I once saw Sid Meier at an airport and I didn’t attempt to kill him or even slip a note into his thick jacket pocket threatening his life if he ever made a bad game.
Also I bought the horse armour.