The crackup in the House GOP has gotten so bad that some Republicans are now asking Democrats for help in electing a speaker. So far, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the current favorite among the right, hasn’t gotten anywhere close to the 217 votes he needs to secure the job.

With Republicans fractured and in need of saving, what should happen is that a few vulnerable members (such as those representing districts Joe Biden won in 2020) join Democrats in supporting Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), for the position. But that’s unlikely, because any Republicans who dare to do this would see their careers implode.

The next best thing, then, is a deal that both sides can accept. Republicans will have to offer meaningful concessions to Democrats to have any hope of getting their support for a consensus, relatively moderate GOP speaker.

At an absolute minimum, a compromise would tackle the core problem: That a few extreme members can propel the House into total meltdown, rendering it ungovernable. Several high-profile, non-MAGA Republicans, such as Reps. Mike D. Rogers (Ala.) and María Elvira Salazar (Fla.), have publicly called on Democrats to specify what they would need to throw the GOP a lifeline — and Democrats have several ideas in mind.

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re correct. Democrats are not responsible for cleaning up this mess. But unlike Republicans, Democrats have a vested interest in a functioning government and serving the people. That’s not happening while Republicans are milling about trying to grab power for themselves. Democrats can use their infighting against them to force some concessions that would restore the House to some semblance of functionality and resume the business of government.

      • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know why Jim Jordon didn’t get enough votes? Why he has never passed a piece of legislation in his 16 years in the House of Representative? You’re getting a real time explanation by watching his campaign to become speaker. He can’t build a coalition. His idea of soft power is twisting arms. Most House Democrats will tell you that they are ready to work with Republicans, no Republicans respond. Takes two to tango.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          1 year ago

          This has been the problem with Republicans for the last 30 years or so:

          “WE’RE THE MINORITY PARTY! You have to do it OUR way or YOU’RE not being ‘BIPARTISAN!’”

          “WE’RE THE MAJORITY PARTY! You have to do it OUR way! Elections mean things!”

        • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          All thanks to that festering cunt Newt Gingrich.

          That fat, adulterous asshole started us down the path of extreme partisanship. The world will be a better place when he dies.

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        The article has some valid points about Dem options, but how can the Dems expect the Magats to act in good faith? As some shitty ex-president said,“Fool me once…”

        • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the only way to get a good faith promise out of the Republicans is to insist on a Speaker of the Dem’s choice. Could be a Moderate Republican or a Moderate Democrat. But it has to be somebody who has a history of reaching across the aisle and keeping promises. With how the GOP of late has acted, I can’t think of a single candidate on the R side of the Aisle.

        • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t reach out to the MAGAts. They reach out to the ones voting against Gym and Scalise. The ones like McCarthy who are willing to cut a deal with Democrats in order to do their jobs instead of simply trolling the nation in the name of their Anointed One/God Emperor.

      • Nougat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        But unlike Republicans, Democrats have a vested interest in a functioning government and serving the people. That’s not happening while Republicans are milling about trying to grab power for themselves.

        Getting some concessions that the Republican majority would almost certainly reneg on would be both a tactical and strategic failure. A functioning government that serves the people is one with far fewer Republicans in it.

        • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed, but that’s our responsibility. House Democrats can’t do anything about that until we get out the votes.

          • Nougat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s too late. The Republican majority in the House is going to fuck everything up, with or without a Speaker. Democrats should not be party to that. Republicans in government will move us all from democracy to open government-supported fascism. Appeasement doesn’t work against fascism. Cooperation doesn’t work against fascism. Appeasement and cooperation only make a person complicit in the outcome.

            It’s going to get much worse than it already is, but we can’t go back the way we came. The only way out is through.

      • Rottcodd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        But unlike Republicans, Democrats have a vested interest in a functioning government and serving the people.

        I don’t think that’s true.

        Exactly like the Republicans, Democrats have a vested interest in just creating enough of an appearance of serving the people to get re-elected, but not so much that it interferes with their actual goal of benefitting themselves and their wealthy cronies and patrons.

        Republicans can do that fairly straightforwardly, by spinning lies about “deregulation” and “privatization” and such - by overtly pushing for legislation that will benefit the rich and just dressing it up in a sort of costume.

        Democrats have a harder time of it because there’s no easy way to make legislation explicitly designed to benefit the oligarchy look like it’s designed to benefit the people at large. So Democrats’ role is mostly just to provide the illusion of opposition - to stand against Republican proposals but not quite manage to defeat them, and to make proposals of their own but not quite manage to pass them.

        And as far as that goes, this is a perfect opportunity for them. They can, and certainly will, just make ineffectual noise and accomplish nothing of substance, then blame the Republicans for the failure to accomplish anything of substance.

          • Rottcodd@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            This from someone who self-evidently thinks that labels and stereotypes are fit substitutes for arguments.

            Yes - I understand that your blind partisanship requires you to believe that opposition to one party requires absolute, unqualified, uncritical and unthinking obedience to the other, but though it’s apparently beyond your own grasp, it is possible to both support a party and criticize it.

            In fact, in a healthy representative democracy, that would arguably be the norm - the parties would be shifting to accommodate the criticisms of the people rather than presenting themselves as fait accompli and demanding unthinking loyalty and condemning criticism.

            But of course, this is anything but a healthy representative democracy.

            And that’s not a coincidence.

            • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You have utterly failed to offer anything substantial to the conversation. but we appreciate your participation nevertheless.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. Let the Republicans twist in the wind till they are begging and pleading for salvation. And don’t “ask” for concessions make demand.

      People will vote for the extremist candidate regardless of what the current house Republicans do to keep our government functioning. They either grow a backbone and do their job or they keep looking like incompetent fools, which we know they are anyways.