No match thread, so made this for discussion

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Pretty dull game this, especially since the Young red card. Both bookings were correct though IMO.

    I also think, despite the attempts of the commentators (and Dyche) to curry controversy, that Konate’s foul there was not enough for a yellow card. If there hadn’t already been a red card and if Konate hadn’t already been booked, nobody would have been saying the later one was a yellow.

    Also, Ally McCoist continues to be a dreadful co-commentator.

    • ryan213@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think it should’ve been a second yellow, based on the cynicism of that foul. He knew else he was doing.

      Also, Liverpool should’ve had two penalties. Not sure why the first one wasn’t given.

      • TanakaAsuka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah very confused about that first one as it was clearly a foul, he completely takes Diaz out and doesn’t get near the ball. If Diaz isn’t fouled he is completely free on goal (albeit at a not great angle)

        • keyez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The Patterson challenge? Looks a pen at first but on replays there’s no real egregious contact.

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s definitely a yellow based on the yellow that Tark received, they’re almost identical