• raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In the first sentence I also acknowledged that you were correct in a literal sense, but you did do some editorializing. As for whether I think dronerights was being trans/nbphobic I’m still not sure because there is more evidence than I stated with and it leads into some topics I don’t feel equipped to make any sort of judgement on, as I alluded to in the last sentence.

      I don’t think trying to explain myself was uncalled for when the circumstances made me look like I was intentionally and knowingly defending enbyphobic behavior. Not being perceived as a trans/nbphobe here is actually really important to me.

      • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not being perceived as a trans/nbphobe here is actually really important to me.

        kinda surprising tbh given how many words you’re writing to defend enby erasure here and that you’re still doing it!

        all for what, to defend the honor of an obvious shit-stirrer who’s been banned for a while now? seems like you don’t need much motivation to cast doubt on what your trans comrades here are telling you. putting you back on block now

        tldr cissues

        • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m sorry that nuance requires so many words I guess, but when I just got my ass handed to me for using too few you can kind of understand it right?

          "If you use they/them...you'll never gender someone correctly."
          

          Explain how that’s not reactionary.

          You demanded that I explain a specific thing out of context.

          https://lemm.ee/post/12418057

          Oh look I was right, dronerights was not expressing nbphobia it the way you presented it.
          You editorialized it and I recognized that it didn’t make sense in context, and challenged it on that basis. I had read every single comment and post by dronerights because I thought it was interesting and if what you said it had said was true I would have remembered it.

          I acknowledged my part in being unclear and maybe I suck at explaining myself but you’re making no effort to listen to what I’m actually saying, when you have literally no good reason to think I’m being disingenuous. I’m open to self crit here but I also know that I’m not doing the thing I’m being accused of and If I’m wrong it’s out of ignorance not malice.

          • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            holy shit read the fucking thread in the post you linked, the top comment re-explains what I’ve been saying in like four words

            the ‘nuance’ you and it are circlejerking over is just more words saying the god damn thing

            THIS IS STILL ENBY ERASURE. SELF CRIT YOUR TRANSPHOBIA CISSIE

            • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Me, three comments up this chain:

              If a person’s preferred pronouns are they/them that is valid and those are the pronouns you should use.

              Dronerights, replying to that same top comment:

              I agree.

              Please stop painting me a fucking transphobe. It’s a huge stretch to suggest that I think any pronouns except they/them are acceptable but I still went ahead and spelled it out for you

              • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                lmao what a willful misreading of that thread, transphobe. ‘I agree, [more enby erasure]’ does not shorten to ‘I agree’. Especially when there’s more back and forth from a nonbinary person there again saying the exact same fucking thing I’ve been here, with dronerights behaving exactly the same way there.

                clearly its ban was justified and I’ll be surprised-pika when you catch yours too

                stop being transphobic if you don’t want that label, cissie.

                • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You might have noticed that I’m not dronerights and I’m not responsible for it’s comments, particularly ones made after my initial post, but that “I agree” is uncontestable proof that the specific form of NB erasure you’re accusing me of supporting was your misreading.