A new study rebukes notion that only men were hunters in ancient times. It found little evidence to support the idea that roles were assigned specifically to each sex. Women were not only physically capable of being hunters, but there is little evidence to support that they were not hunting.
old.reddit.com
Posted in r/science by u/mvea • 1,200 points and 306 comments

They’re mostly getting dunked on, but they’re wriggling around all over the thread raging about science being made “political.”

wojak-nooo frothingfash pit clown-to-clown-communication clown-to-clown-conversation grill-broke elmofire Bwaaa NOOOOO

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Emergent behaviours emerge from simple observations

    I don’t think it’s possible to deliver that in a more condescending and Reddity way while providing less explanation of where you actually stand.

    Your straw manning isn’t me moving goalposts

    Your masturbatory sense of inflated self-regard would make you plenty of fairweather friends in a lower division STEM class, but otherwise all I see is a “nuh uh.”

    glasses-off

    isn’t a statement about the emergent behaviour of the population

    All I see is glasses-on

    I believe that FEEEEEMALES statistically select for conveniently helpmeet roles in a way that makes exceptions and different cultures irrelevant because biotruths, and I do it in a plausibly deniable way that doesn’t sound like misogyny, bucko. up-yours-woke-moralists

    it’s probably worth taking a step back from the monitor for a few minutes

    You first, and take your fedora with you after tipping it.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        I hope you find whatever you’re searching for in life

        Reddit-brained “totally not misogynist, buuuuuuuuuuut” misogynists try to walk away from arguments without smug concern trolling attempts challenge. Difficulty level: expert-shapiro