• JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see this as a win. It’s absurd that anyone can own the term Taco Tuesday. It’s literally a noun and a day of the week

    • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you not remember the youtube drama over someone claiming the word “react”?

      That was only 1 word…

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m really surprised that this is the top post here.

      It’s not just a noun and a day of the week. It’s a noun and a day of the week used to formally sell tacos.

      This is Taco Bell using its size and wealth to take something from smaller players so that it could make money with it.

      And the smallest players have always had absolutely nothing to worry about. Part of trademark law is that you must defend it. That can be just a letter.

          • theragu40@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well no, they couldn’t. The article literally says that prior to this only that one bar in New Jersey could use it because they had a statewide trademark on it. Because they dropped it, anyone can now use it including other small bars in Jersey.

            What this is doing is ensuring it remains open for use by anyone. Taco Bell, Taco Johns, Taco Suzy, whatever. Before, anyone could register for the trademark if no one else had, and start screwing over other small players.

  • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    My favorite bar here in town has a letter from Taco John’s framed on the wall explaining why they had to change the name of their weekly taco special.

  • DABDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because of their prices I’d basically given up on Taco Bell except for the value menu. But now every item that was $1 jumped to $1.5 (and everything else went up with it) so I’m cutting out Taco Bell completely. A few months back one of their limited time offers was $5 but when ordered à la carte was $12.47 – that kinda revealed just how (unreasonably) skewed their profit margins must be.

    • Carvex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It used to be $5-10 to feel gross and full, now it’s $15-20 and takes 15 minutes both inside or drive through. I haven’t been back in a couple years because of price and incompetence, there’s better options for cheaper and quicker. Sheetz the gas station has been nailing Amerimexican for years if you’re north east.

      • Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like $12 for a crunchwrap meal in my super low CoL town. Wemdy’s still has their $5 buggie bag. I used to love Taco Bell but it now costs more than freaking Chipotle.

        • spamfajitas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          $5.69 for a crunchwrap in my relatively high CoL town. $5.99 for a “build your own cravings box” that’s kinda like a biggie bag but maybe slightly less food and the specialty item can be a crunchwrap.

          • Mobile_Audience@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Build your own cravings box is amazing. Where I live you can’t order it in-store, it’s online order exclusive. But I think some locations don’t do it, which is sad.

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still love the food, but Taco Bell is one of the most expensive fast food places around me.

        They never have deals. Everyone else has something like a 2 for $6 and/or they offer good coupons.

    • Fraylor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I only go when I want to have the specific flavor profile they create. If I want actual Mexican food, they’re my absolute last option

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but that Breakfast Steak Crunchwrap with extra creamy jalapeño sauce…

      Greatest fast food breakfast item. And I’ve eaten an embarrassing amount of fast food breakfast.

    • xpinchx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The McDonald’s app always has pretty good deals. 2 spicy chicken for $3 right now.

      • DABDA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The over-reliance on apps and the privacy/security implications that entails is a separate issue for me. I also don’t have the Google Play Store (or the associated underlying services) that all the apps require to function on my phone (CalyxOS). Comcast was decertifying my ancient modem so I finally bought a new one. When I needed to swap the hardware id info over and called their support line all of their workflows now apparently rely on using their app. When I told them it was between them supplying me with a vanilla smartphone or me cancelling my service because I didn’t own any devices that supported their app they were then magically able to just update some fields in their database and my modem was set-up with no mobile phones or apps involved. I’ve had a passion for technology my entire life but its current predatory and user hostile default state just makes me hate it.

        • xpinchx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No worries mate, that’s pretty hardcore. Guess we gotta make lunch at home or pay up 😂

  • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Scandinavia it’s Taco Friday. Who has the rights to that? Who needs to get sued? Who should we be mad at?

    As far as I know, nobody. They understand the social good. And they celebrate it with tacos promptly when the workday ends at 4 PM.

  • Mamertine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck Taco Bell. Taco Bell only won because Taco John’s didn’t have deep enough pockets to defend the trademarked term they legally had.

    • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      149
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look, fuck the gross Yum Brands mega conglomerate, but the idea that someone could own the trademark to “Taco Tuesday” is fucking ridiculous.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        1 year ago

        Welcome to the US, where the rules are made up and the goalposts are set by the deepest pockets.

      • whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        What makes it fucking stupid? Is it because it reaches a critical mass of usage, so the people get to take it back? Something else?

        As an aside, I have a new product idea: Zoidberg’s Super Bowl of Cereal: I’m Lovin’ It!

        • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is it because it reaches a critical mass of usage, so the people get to take it back?

          It’s not my point but that’s literally how it legally works in the US. That’s why Velcro insists on calling their product “Velcro brand hook and loop fastener”

        • Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a food item and a day of the week.

          Yeah, “super bowl” also shouldn’t be trade marked, It’s far too generalized to be reasonable. Zoidberg should be as that is a character in a show and should be claimed by the creators with exception given to people whom have that name in real life referring to their own products.

          I’m lovin’ it also shouldn’t be trademarked. It’s literally just an expression of joy.

          I don’t get why this has to be a difficult concept. McDonald’s didn’t create anything new. The NFL didn’t fabricate the concept of extraordinary dishware. It is absolutely nonsense that anyone with enough money and influence can just choose a couple pre-existing words out of the English language and claim ownership.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually do think of Taco John’s when I think of Taco Tuesday because that was their big special thing for decades.

        But I also don’t care if ‘Taco Tuesday’ is something you can trademark. If Taco Bell wants to use it, fine.

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Look at all that Midwest. Surely these tacos have to be cursed stains on the name. Especially from John. John ain’t know no tacos.

            • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I can’t shit talk taco john’s because we have Jim boy’s tacos out here in Norrhern California lol

              They put Parmesan cheese on the shells

          • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So if I read the article correctly, they owned the trademark to “taco Tuesday” in States they didn’t even have stores in? “Intellectual property” is such a farce

              • dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, I understand how it works, nothing in your rambling justification is new to me. This one case is not the only reason why I think “intellectual property” is stupid. Just like with crypto weirdos, people who support “intellectual property” absolutely cannot fathom that someone knows how it works and doesn’t like it.

              • Hydroel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your explanation is interesting (and I learned a thing or two), but it fails to explain how such a term as Taco Tuesday could be considered a trademark in locations where the owner of the trademark is implanted.

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh wow, I had no idea there were two of them in my state, (but other side of it from the major cities) - I definitely first heard of it in relation to the copyright claim.

    • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should have never been granted the trademark based on prioriry. They did not coin or use the term first. They are not fighting because they know they wouldn’t survive a challenge which is why they just bullied small shops who themselves didn’t have the pockets to defend themselves.

      • ExecutiveStapler@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that’s what happened? Based on this article and another one I read, it seems that now the Taco Tuesday trademark is relinquished meaning anyone can use it. I’m guessing taco bell would rather everyone be able to use it including them rather than it being locked down by someone who’s not them.

        • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed that was the case:

          According to The Strange History of Taco Tuesday, the promotional phrase was started in 1982 by a chain called Taco John’s based out of Cheyenne, Wyoming. In fact, Taco John’s placed a registered trademark on the phrase in 1989 to attach it to their brand. They filed a lawsuit against another restaurant chain after seeing that it was used, but the lawsuit resulted in bad press, so they have stopped enforcing their trademark. They still use it as their brand’s signature, and rightfully so!

          https://bennystacos.com/taco-tuesday-legendary-tradition/

          So Taco John gave up the trademark and now any restaurant can advertise “Taco Tuesday” specials.

    • Superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Taco Bell may not be the hero we want, but having a trademark on “Taco Tuesday” is insane and I’m glad they won

      • Steve Anonymous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I read that article as a large corporation bullied a small company into getting rid of their trademark. I could be wrong

        • Voyajer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          That was themselves bullying even smaller companies from using the most basic and obvious alliterative advertising.