• NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sony’s, not Microsoft’s, AAA dominance is bad for the video game industry. Video games are a somewhat unique medium in that smaller development houses can and do compete with the megacorps. I’d rather Sony have healthy direct competition over them eating up even more market share.

    Competition between Sony and Microsoft with Nintendo also having their own parallel strategy is good and better than the alternative, imo.

      • Tempotown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Sony is so far ahead in the console battle that it’s important they have competition (Nintendo is not competition).

        There’s a push and pull here in terms of exclusives being bad but also having Sony becoming a monopoly / having no completion would also be bad.

        • wcSyndrome@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I very much agree competition is good but this should be brought about by Microsoft producing competitive games/services rather than purchasing more of the industry. For the record, I don’t like the idea of Sony or another large corporation buying other studios or publishers either

          • Tempotown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even Microsoft agrees they’d prefer to do it by producing competitive games, which isn’t in question here though. The dispute is whether this gives Microsoft an anti-competitive monopoly.

            Even though mergers of this size aren’t good for gamers, it doesn’t even put Microsoft anywhere near equal footing with Sony, never mind giving Microsoft a monopoly.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            but this should be brought about by Microsoft producing competitive games/services rather than purchasing more of the industry.

            Why, because you say so?

        • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          And Microsoft becoming a monopoly/ having no competition is good? How is anyone supposed to complete with a billion dollar company who can just out buy the competition?

          I take it that if Sony responded with buying out 2K and making all those games exclusive you’d be fine with it because that’s healthy competition for Microsoft?

          • Crazycarl1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just waiting for Amazon to buy EA or Ubisoft and have them say its exclusice for Amazon Luna subscribers and gamers to go “wow, this is great I can finally play Assassins Creed on my phone and it increases competition!”

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And Microsoft becoming a monopoly/ having no competition is good?

            Microsoft aren’t going to have a monopoly in video games at any time in the foreseeable future.

              • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The fact that they’re a distant third behind Sony and nintendo despite being in the industry for over twenty years.

                What makes you think Microsoft will have a monopoly any time soon? You do understand what a monopoly is don’t you?

    • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You just seem like an Xbox fanboy upset at Sony’s actions, trying to hurt them at the expense of the consumer. It seems immature.

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I assure you that that’s not it. I’ve owned every company’s consoles over the years and want to see competition. Microsoft seems to be currently flailing and I think that that’s bad for the industry as a whole.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        trying to hurt them at the expense of the consumer

        Vastly more consumers benefit from this purchase than are hurt, so no, I don’t think it’s that. The only people it “hurts” are Sony fanboys.

        Also nothing that person said indicates that they are “hurt” in any way. Maybe take a look in the mirror to see who is hurt by this deal.

        • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haven’t bought a console outside of a Switch in 15 years. I fail to see how anyone can see the 22nd largest company in the world buying one of the largest games publishers in the world is not going to bring a benefit, and I don’t think Microsoft needs to worry about expanding its cashflow.