I played the Steam version of the base game, with no DLC. I did not play the Spacer’s Choice “remaster” as it has a reputation for being broken and poorly put together. I played the game to completion on normal difficulty, completing most of the side quests, spending time with all my companions, and trying to get the most out of one playthough.

The game begins as a derelict colony ship called the Hope has just reached the Halcyon system, the setting of the game. The system had already been settled years earlier by a sister colony ship, but due to setbacks the Hope was decades behind schedule and presumed lost by the colony. The original ship apparently contained too many middle managers for its own good, as the human colonies have become the fiefdoms of various corporations who can’t think beyond short terms profits. The appearance of the Hope, containing thousands of frozen scientists and engineers could provide a boost in the chances of human success (assuming a way to bring everyone out of stasis without killing them is found), but the corporations don’t know how to handle the novel situation. A rogue scientist unwilling to sit back breaches the corporate blockade and manages to grab one frozen passenger from the Hope before fleeing. The player is of course, that lucky person who is freed. Already the game’s conceit of a person chosen at random from among thousands lends itself to a wide variety of character types. While the overall goal of the game is to help the rest of the people left behind on the Hope, it doesn’t railroad the disposition, background, or personal goals of a character in the same way that for example, a parent looking for a child might.

I made a character that had high speech and engineering skills, as I wanted to take advantage of as many unique solutions to problems as I could. That turned out to be the right decision. The game has many skill checks for medical, engineering, perception, and other character traits to allow alternatives to violence. I always appreciate having dialog or skill options open to me.

What I found while playing was that combat was easy to the point of tedium. The Unreal engine and the excellent animations of the guns made the gunplay itself feel well enough, but the enemies were uninteresting both in variety and in tactics. For a short time, I increased the difficulty, but that did not solve the issue of enemies being boring, it only made the boring combat last longer, so I continued the game on normal difficulty. A large variety of feral beasts which I never really changed up tactics against, and then a smattering of bandits and corporate guards, which might occasionally require taking cover as they enclosed on me while firing, but never did anything more made up the bulk of combat. The game lacks throwable grenades, which is small but once noticed feels like a strange omission. Projectile weapons are fed with either light or heavy ammunition. This may have been done to ensure players can use a variety of weapons, but in practice I found that it made me just use whatever had the highest damage per second. When pistols, shotguns, and miniguns all share the same ammo pool I don’t feel the need to switch between them. The lack of ammunition variety is contrasted with the bewildering amount of aid items. By the end of the game my inventory was filled to the brim with variation upon variation of aid item. All all of these items could only be used by assigning them as addition effects to my health recharging inhaler. For some reason I could inhale aerosolized meat and alcohol but I couldn’t just eat or drink it.

Companions in the game are fantastic characters and I had a lot of fun listening to their banter. Once again however, strange design choices cropped up. In battle, every companion has their own special attack. I couldn’t tell the companions to do these attacks on their own, but had to specifically order it every time which felt like too much micromanaging. When the attack happens there is a mini-cutscene. It was really fun…the first time I saw it. Then I realized that every single time the companion did the attack I had to watch the cutscene, disrupting the flow of combat. Turning off the cinematic camera doesn’t stop this. I got to the point where I just stopped having companions do their special attacks.

In similarly bizarre fashion, companion quests forced me to travel across multiple planets for every quest. For some like Vicor Max’s pursuit of religious truth, this felt appropriate as it was a long term kind of goal. However for another companion I had to get her ready for a date, requiring me to traverse two planets and a space station. The interactions were cute, but the setup was tiresome. The same quest could have all been condensed into running around one of the hubs instead of three, and been better for it.

What makes the game stand out is the tremendously well realized setting. There is a strong vision of a Gilded Age aesthetic and corporatist tone, which is combined with space opera trappings. There is a pessimism infused into the world in everything from low level workers tiredly reciting company jingles upon meeting me, to the slowly dawning realization about why diet toothpaste is so important. The game manages to play absolutely absurdity with a straight face, in a way where it all manages to come together. In many RPGs I find myself wondering how a quest hub settlement manages to survive without imploding. The Outer Worlds has thought about my questions and answers them, though often the answer is that the settlement is imploding.

While the game was often advertised as a followup to Fallout New Vegas, in truth it has different DNA. The lead writer and co-director, Leonard Boyarsky didn’t work on New Vegas, but was a designer on the first Fallout, and later wrote the main story of Fallout 2. The other half of the co-directing duo on the Outer Worlds was Tim Cain, who similarly had no hand in New Vegas, but had been the lead on the original Fallout. If you are familiar with the sensibilities of these two, the similarities to the tone of the original Fallout come into focus. The differences between the Boyarsky/Cain writing and New Vegas are subtle but unmistakable. While the writers of New Vegas probably would reject the idea of a vendor wearing a giant mascot head as too silly and the writers of Fallout 3&4 would lean into it being extremely silly, The Outer Worlds presents the corporate mascot and then shows that the man under the mask is suffering as part of his company mandated role. A blend of wacky and dark, of outrageous with thought out.

If you want a pared back but well written adventure in space, and you don’t mind putting up with a bit of ho-hum combat, this game is for you. It doesn’t having the sprawling width of Fallout 4 or Starfield, but it has a vision that it does everything in it’s power to realize.

Also posted this on my blog. (I have other stuff too!)

  • Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really wanted to like this one. On paper it sounds like exactly my jam, but it just didn’t grab me. The whole game felt tedious. Mediocre combat, very little weapon variety (just different tiers of the same kind of gun). Finicky and overcomplicated skill system that still somehow didn’t feel like it made any impact on core gameplay, and I found the humour kind of simultaneously weak and overdone. The satire is heavy-handed, and the wackiness falls flat. I haven’t enjoyed a fallout game since 3 either though, so maybe my taste has changed without me realising.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue I think is that every single thing is setup for some punchline. The world isn’t taken seriously. It’s all a basis for a joke. Fallout NV was taken seriously. It had humor, but the world felt consistent and well thought out. That’s why it works, and it’s also why the humor hits better. If everything is a joke then almost nothing is funny.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, that one is great in FONV. In The Outer Worlds literally every conversation is like this one though. It works well as one character, but not when it’s everyone.

      • Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I think you got it. The humour in Fallout is subtle, it’s satire. OW borders on farce.

        • GONADS125@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say you stopped at FO3. Have you tried FNV?

          I always preferred the story of 3, but the gameplay of NV had quality of life improvements and way better gun-play.

          I’d definitely recommend giving it a shot if you haven’t.

          • Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, I said I haven’t enjoyed one since 3. I tried NV because I really wanted more FO3, and I’ve seen enough videos to get why people like it, but I just didn’t. The crafting system and changes to combat mechanics felt too complicated at the time. Like, I had to go gather three different materials to build the ammo just to break one guy’s tank. I didn’t have any issue with the plot or writing, it just felt like busywork. Likewise with FO4, it’s a mile wide but an inch deep. There’s a ton of stuff to do, but very little reason to care about it. Like, yeah, some asshole stole my kid but I’m just gonna go spend however many hours building out this gas station. FO3 just felt like the perfect balance between grindy RPG mechanics and plot driven missions.

            I have the same issue with a lot of modern RPGs. Like in Cyberpunk 2077 there’s all this narrative pressure because you’re dying and it seems like that should be an urgent problem to solve, but the only way to get the “best” ending is to spend as much time as possible doing unrelated sidequests and levelling up. FO3 just felt like there was always a reason you were doing what you were doing.

            • GONADS125@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I 100% agree with you. I was downvoted a lot of times years ago saying about as much on reddit. I like the iron-sights and some mechanics of NV that 3 didn’t have, but the storyline in 3 was so much better.

              In 3, there was a tremendous core story that you played a pivotal role in and had a grand sense of purpose. But in NV, you’re just a random courrier doing random tasks and just kinda meandering around for “revenge” which comes and goes pretty anticlimacticly. And then you get to decide which factions to support in a battle that’s going to happen regardless.

              In NV, it feels more like the player character is a side-character in the main story’s plot. In Fallout 3, you were the main plot.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You hit the nail on the head for me. I tried to like this game, but it felt lackluster time and again. And I enjoyed Fallout NV and to a lesser degree 4. Outer Worlds just did not do it for me.