King@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWoman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AIwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up153arrow-down1external-linkWoman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AIwww.theguardian.comKing@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareentropy@not.alazy.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoWouldn’t the simple use of exif data be able to disprove that? Also the proof of the set, clothes, etc.?
minus-squareAnders429@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoExif data is easily modifiable.
minus-squarevinnymac@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoYou can modify exif data easily, but yea I think this could be verified in a myriad of ways to legitimize the photo.
Wouldn’t the simple use of exif data be able to disprove that? Also the proof of the set, clothes, etc.?
Exif data is easily modifiable.
You can modify exif data easily, but yea I think this could be verified in a myriad of ways to legitimize the photo.