The Justice Department Monday criticized former President Trump for ā€œattempts to sanitize his conductā€ leading up to the Jan. 6 Capitol riots, urging a judge to reject several motions to dismiss the case and disentangle Trump from the storming of the building.

The four filings, together more than 100 pages, respond to a series of pretrial motions filed by the Trump team last month asking the judge to toss the former presidentā€™s 2020 election case on a number of grounds, ranging from arguments the charges step on his First Amendment rights and that his speech simply amounted to raising concerns about the election to claims he is facing a ā€œvindictive prosecution.ā€

Prosecutors forcefully defended their indictment while accusing Trump of ā€œperpetrating an unprecedented campaign of deceit.ā€

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    11 months ago

    Heā€™s not really being tried for his association with the storming of the building, he wasnā€™t there and he used enough weasel words in his speech to have legal plausible deniability.

    Heā€™s on trial for being part of the fake electors scheme and all the other illegal attempts to overturn a free and fair election. Which is way worse.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      11 months ago

      Heā€™s not really being tried for his association with the storming of the building,

      Yeah, but that doesnā€™t mean his lawyers are competent enough to make a reasonable argument that doesnā€™t invent grievances where there are none.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        11 months ago

        And even if they wanted to file some motion that might work, Trump might stop them because he wants them to file ā€œelection interference/First Amendment Violation/Witch Huntā€ motions instead. And Donald is the one signing the theoretical checks (which should be arriving in 2 weeks if the lawyers werenā€™t smart enough to get paid up front).

        Trumpā€™s legal strategy is to delay any consequences until January 2025, be sworn in as President, and then not only pardon himself, but arrest anyone who dared to charge him with crimes.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          11 months ago

          The part that gives me the most hope in all this is he canā€™t pardon himself out of the NY fraud case or the Georgia interference case. The former is a state civil case and the latter is a state criminal case.

          And vis a vis his dream of arresting his opponents, I imagine that even if he guts the entire White House and installs only cronies, heā€™ll still face opposition across the other branches of government and the various state governments that would inevitably need to be involved.

          • TechyDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            Ā·
            11 months ago

            Oh, definitely. I donā€™t want to test that, though. Better for him to not get anywhere near the White House ever again.

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        11 months ago

        His lawyers know they donā€™t have a case, so theyā€™re using a tried and true strategy of annoying the judge into making a mistake that they can appeal on.