Swimming_Monitor@sh.itjust.works to Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-21 year agoWhat is your most controversial opinion?message-squaremessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up130arrow-down1message-squareWhat is your most controversial opinion?Swimming_Monitor@sh.itjust.works to Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square172fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSwimming_Monitor@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOkay, thanks for explaining. If I understand correctly, you’re saying that a person’s sex should only be referenced when it is relevant, which is only in a narrow set of situations. Any reference in speech to a person should not invoke his sex.
minus-squareMomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·edit-27 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSwimming_Monitor@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoReality.
minus-squareMomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-27 months agoRemoved by mod
Okay, thanks for explaining.
If I understand correctly, you’re saying that a person’s sex should only be referenced when it is relevant, which is only in a narrow set of situations. Any reference in speech to a person should not invoke his sex.
Removed by mod
Reality.
Removed by mod