• TheHolyChecksum@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I stopped reading when they said that there is two “extraordinary” possibilities. A foreign nation doing surveillance or tests is not extraordinary ffs, it’s almost the definition of something being ordinary. Again, it’s all conjecture, no evidence of anything. Thrash article.

    • HM05@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You stopped reading at the first paragraph, but you’re judging the whole article as trash? And, I think it’s fair to say that a foreign nation having technology that is advanced beyond our current understanding or expectations to be extraordinary. Extraordinary doesn’t need to be some whimsical expectation, there are extraordinary feats by humans all the time.

    • treadful
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A foreign nation doing surveillance or tests is not extraordinary ffs, it’s almost the definition of something being ordinary.

      The fact that they would do it and the US couldn’t identify it as such would be extraordinary. Also, the entire article is heavily cited from actual government documents so whatever dude.