Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoMore like guidelineslemmy.worldimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down118cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1461arrow-down1imageMore like guidelineslemmy.worldRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year ago zero weight were easily observable how?
minus-squaretigeruppercutlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down1·1 year agoPeople looked at yo mama and could immediately conceive of the opposite
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 year ago conceive of the opposite Meh I don’t believe that they could avoid overshooting to negative weight
minus-square_danny@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoHow much water, by weight, is in an empty cup? Round to the nearest amount an average 17th century merchant could identify.
minus-squareBillyTheSkidMark@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoI guess in terms of an actual weightless object… Not… But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that’s half a weight unit, take two away, that’s zero weight units.
how?
People looked at yo mama and could immediately conceive of the opposite
Meh I don’t believe that they could avoid overshooting to negative weight
How much water, by weight, is in an empty cup? Round to the nearest amount an average 17th century merchant could identify.
I guess in terms of an actual weightless object… Not… But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that’s half a weight unit, take two away, that’s zero weight units.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod