• Heresy_generator@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s the Chair of the Committee; it is quite literally his job to maintain decorum and everyone else’s job to not speak out of turn. Only Mullin was being a child here, no reason to impugn everyone else in the room for doing what they were supposed to be doing and letting the Chair handle it.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And to be clear, mullin is doing this because he got his fee fees hurt by a mean twitter reply.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who are these others whose honor you are so concerned with? Those chairs are mostly empty. The bums didn’t even show up.

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        The other guy was called to Congress by Congress I believe. Basically he was summoned or asked to be their to testify. TBH I dont know the circumstances of his presence but often you can’t ‘refuse’ to show up.

        So from the perspective of a citizen being summoned to testify before a Senate committee, then being challenged to a physical fight from a Senator while he is there… its absolutely unequivocally Mullin’s fault. Imagine going to court for a speeding ticket and the judge challenges you to a fist fight. You can’t not show up and now you have to deal with somone trying to physically assault you?!?

        GTFO. Mullin is a clown.

      • Enkrod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t care if those “tough guys” want to slog it out, but the choice of time and place shows such a serious lack of common sense that it would be alarming for a professional fighter, not to mention an elected representative.

        The guy thought that, when challenged anytime anywhere, there and then, in Congress, during a hearing would be a good time and place. smh

          • Enkrod@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            One of those people is not a US Senator. The Senator was the one bringing it up, getting all worked up over a Tweet. The Senator, chose “Congress” as the place and “during a hearing” as the time. Both these decisions are absolutely unfit for a US Senator.

            Go fucking meet the guy behind a 7eleven after work or something like that. But nooo, the Senator said “here is a place, now is a time” because he needed to look like a tough guy in front of cameras.

              • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Either you are trolling or being intentionally obtuse because being a Senator absolutely has a bearing on this. He should have a modicum of decorum, professionalism, political savvy, tact, and respect for his office.

                He should know better. He got clowned by some tweets and should be embarrassed that he printed them out then brought them up in an official hearing then challenged a guy to a fight. Its a joke and makes a mockery of the senate.

          • Faera@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s unreasonable to take the literal meaning od ‘anytime, anywhere’. Like, if he was attending a funeral and the senator turned up and challenged him there, would that still be appropriate? How about if he was visiting a kindergarten? While he’s helping an old woman cross the road? Performing first aid on an injured person?

            There are still times that are appropriate and not appropriate. You could say that the challenge itself was childish and I would agree. But the anytime, anywhere condition doesn’t make it unconditionally ok for the senator to pick this time and place.

              • Faera@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Honestly I agree. I just don’t think that excuses the Senator from actually accepting the challenge at that time and place (or arguably any time and place, but especially that one). Two wrongs don’t make a right…

                  • Faera@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The choice of time and place is irrelevant when the instigating party said, and I quote, “anytime, anywhere”, and then when their challenge was accepted, stood up, ready to engage in said challenge.

                    In response to people saying that the Senator acted inappropriately. But perhaps I misinterpreted. Are you saying they both acted inappropriately? In which case I agree, but I’d still say tweeting a challenge is less inappropriate than actually accepting that challenge at that time and place.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One is a senator, one is the president of the teamsters. There’s a bit of difference there. That’s not to mention one was summoned there and the other one works there. Sure, a physical fight is “silly”, but it’s only beneath one of their job positions.

      • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s not both sides this one. One had great power and one goes to jail for not showing up and smiling.