• egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oof, that might be a solid roadblock limiting peertube/fediverse. Decentralization sounds great as a greediness deterrence system, but it also feels like lesser nodes will be more prone to stop maintenance over many years, making decentralize content more fragile than centralized. I wonder if a way to counterattack this is via enabling posts mirroring and content transfer among fediverse instances… 🤔

    • Shapillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Otoh do we need perfect (or even good) persistence for the 36284th similar bbq tuto or some random-ass cat video?

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I get that point! But imagine “ancient youtube history videos” like “chocolate rain” were hosted on an old and unstable peertube node. I would find it sad that a decentralized infrastructure erased old and historic eras of the internet. I’m not saying this just defeats the whole fediverse, I just find it a point of concern, I’m sure if it is really a problem the developers and community will find approaches to mitigate it!

        (Btw, I’m not yet well informed about all the caveats/tradeoffs/unwritten rules of lemmy/mastodon/peertube when it comes to data storage, so maybe what I’m saying just doesn’t make sense at all, correct me if I’m wrong!!)

        • Shapillon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          My bet is that if a video is famous it’s gonna get replicated. And if it doesn’t, well, it will join the unending list of lost medias.

          Anyway we just can’t archive anything anyone produces forever.