• ShakyPerception@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They are not getting down-voted into nothingness for refusing to tow the party line.

    I appreciate the variety of opinions presented here. Plus (in my experience) the conversation has been civil.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah. I hardcore disagree with conservatives as a libertarian socialist myself, but I always want to hear what people who disagree with me (and people who agree with me) are saying, and engage in civil conversation with people who actually believe what they say.

      The problem for me comes when shills (people who don’t believe what they say but get paid to say it) come into the conversation, or when people use outright disingenuous arguments (usually strawmans).

        • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You very well may be correct, but I always like to assume people are good and are arguing in good faith until proven otherwise.

          If I can “steelman” (opposite of strawman) their position, and argue against it easilly, I see no reason not to do so, and that also makes for a better argument for other people viewing the comment thread who may believe the false notion that climate change is either fake or not caused by humans.

          To me, trying to argue that climate change is fake or not caused by humans is the same as trying to argue that the Earth is flat. Very easy to debunk.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That is a recipe for wasting a huge amount of time in people whose main goal is to waste your time.

        • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they actually believe it, I would like to argue the factual point, which is very easy to do. If they don’t believe what they are saying, then yes, I have a problem with it.

          There is plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that climate change is real and that it is caused by humans. If they choose to not listen to evidence and hard facts, then they lost the debate. If they say that big money funded those studies, simply point them to the Big Oil-funded studies claiming that climate change is false, and the fact that they originally found that it was true, and then tried to bury it.