• Myzornis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    76
    ·
    1 year ago

    … that kind of sucks actually. I’d rather have personalized ads that just random ass ads.

      • Myzornis@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I looked up gaming monitors, I’d rather get ads for PC components rather than ads for soap, for example. If I’m getting ads anyways, I’d want ads for stuff I might actually be interested in. Does that make sense?

          • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            For better or for worse, these services, which people very clearly do enjoy using, would not exist as free services without advertising. Things have costs and they have to get paid by someone, whether directly by the consumer or by advertisers.

            • Eggyhead@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Advertising is one thing. Targeted, personalized, data-harvested advertising is another. The internet can still exist with just normal, non-invasive advertising, you know. It did once.

              • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Something like Youtube could not exist without pretty extensive advertising or direct payment. The data costs at that scale alone are enormous.

                • Eggyhead@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You can’t just have advertisements for computer parts on a YouTube video about computers? Is that so inefficient that google really needs to just track you across websites as well? I doubt it. What you end up with are advertising blinders. You never see anything new or intriguing. Just more versions of stuff you already have because that’s what you clicked on.

                  Hell I probably would have bought some weird stuff from advertisements and might have kicked off some new hobbies if google just showed me ads for the stuff craftsmen use in their videos. Instead I get stupid android game ads that are nothing but annoying. If I trusted ads, I’d probably engage with the more.

            • verysoft@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There’s a fine line of acceptable ads that I think websites stepped over and now everyone hates ads of any kind. They were mostly unobtrusive with the odd banner ad, slowly the whole web started getting more and more aggressive with ads, targeted ads begun and then people wanted rid of them. The cycle of more blocked ads, so they put more ads on, but then more people block, then they add more ads… on and on. Now it’s too hard to convince people to go back to acceptable unobtrusive ads.

        • Trebach@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          When targeted advertising was banned in the Netherlands, NPO (Netherlands Public Omroep) had their various sites switch to advertising based on the contents of the page than the preferences of the user.

          It turned out to be more effective to target the content than the user.

    • Monz@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get your sentiment, but having personalized ads is just an incentive for a lack of user privacy. If we kill the incentive, we can embrace security.

      • meatmeat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        having personalized ads is just an incentive for a lack of user privacy.

        The most salient point here.

    • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meanwhile, targeted ads IRL: We kind of noticed you recently bought LAWNMOWER on Amazon. As a LAWNMOWER aficionado, would you like to buy more LAWNMOWER? Take your pick of these four crappy, overpriced ones. We will bill you like they are gold plated and dropship some junk from China, lol.

      Also, you added your neighbor on Facebook and her aunt recently went on an esoteric streak. Would you like to buy some tarot cards to talk to your recently deceased grandmother or some crystals that can heal ass cancer? Doctors hate this one trick! Mostly because they hate seeing their desperate patients getting scammed, but they do hate it.

      And while we are talking about your nether regions, as a proud owner of a penis you must have thought about enlarging it before, so here are some options …

    • mrgoodc4t@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually tend to agree. I value privacy and I hate the idea of Meg-O-Corp selling my data all over the world but on the other hand, I’ve bought some really cool shit that I love off targeted ads

      So are targeted ads better than just ads? Yes for the consumer in me, no for the private person

    • Zrybew@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is not the personalised ad, but how Meta decides who seems them.

      Today they take a lazy but effective approach of collecting as much data as possible at user level, to draw correlations between the user data and the content of the ad.

      If regulation prohibit them from using this approach they’ll be force to innovate or die.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s disappointing to see how many people are downvoting this because, to them, it’s a “I disagree and think you’re an idiot” button.

      Well, actually, I’ve kinda come to expect it here. People aren’t really interested in actual discourse.