The White House and Democratic members of Congress called Georgia Republicanā€™s comparison a ā€˜complimentā€™

  • DragonAce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Youā€™re NEVER going to get a good option. You vote for the least-worse. Always ā€“ lather, rinse, repeat.

    That is the entire problem and telling people ā€œThats just the way it is, deal with itā€ is not going to solve it. Our ā€œdemocraticā€ system is completely broken, we are given the illusion of choice when in reality all candidates are preselected and paraded in front of the public as if they have our best interests at heart, when in reality they all have the same mandate from their corporate overlords. The US is a corporatocracy masquerading as a democracy, we as ordinary citizens have no real say in the matter. That needs to change, full stop!

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Itā€™s not a broken system when the most popular person wins. No one was preselected.

      A majority of people think Biden is in their best interest.

    • Wiz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      That needs to change, full stop!

      Americaā€™s system of voting ā€œfirst past the postā€ ensures that one of the top two candidates will win. It pretty much guarantees a two-party system will win.

      So, the strategy would be:

        1. Try to get an alternative voting system like ā€œRanked Choice Votingā€ in place. This has been done successfully in Maine and Alaska, I think. We need more of it. [Yes, I know Ranked Choice is not perfect, but itā€™s definitely better than we have.]
        1. Until then, your best vote (mathematically) is to vote for one of the top two candidates that is closest to what you want. Yes, youā€™ll have to hold your nose a few times to vote for the ā€œleast worstā€ of the two, but honestly, itā€™s better than the alternative, of having the ā€œworst worstā€ of the two.

      Hope this helps.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You donā€™t even have to oppose the two party system to support ranked choice. I like ranked choice, especially for state reps/senators, and Iā€™m very pro two-party system.

        I know it opens the door to other parties I donā€™t necessarily want to exist, but itā€™s just a good idea full stop.

    • MossBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      If you want things to change, you have to accept that itā€™s rarely going to be a sudden, profound moment. Itā€™s small steps adding up over time. If people arenā€™t willing to take the small steps, just because theyā€™re not big steps, then weā€™ll all soon find ourselves pulled backwards through our own apathy.