Insights into the kind of crap 78-rpm records were made of, and other scarce technical infos.

If you’re not sure what ‘a record’ is, or haven’t ever seen one, you’re excused.

Oh, and by-the-way, 78 is the approximate number you get when you rotate a 46-tooth gear with a 3600 rpm motor. (60 cycles per second.)

Further wisdom such as this is found by the ton here: http://www.78rpmrecord.com/links.htm

  • stown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Here’s some flame bait:

    Why would you want to listen to your music in this inferior format? I get it if there aren’t any modern recordings or quality transfers but to actually sit down and enjoy the low signal to noise ratio of a record just boggles the mind.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tbf vinyls can have a great sound if properly mastered and played on high end equipment with noise cancelling. And they look cooler than CDs or subscription services. I can see the appeal, however hipsters playing dirty records on cheap 60’s turntables and pretending it sounds better than even MP3 on a Bluetooth speaker are just dumb.

    • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not rage bait, completely fair. Depends on how you define “quality”. To me, records have a warm and full sound that feels nice filling a room with. Also, I think there is something to be said for the act of playing music on a physical media that is annoying to skip songs with. There is something I like about physically looking through the albums on my shelf, picking one out, admiring the cover art, and putting it on. It’s kind of a ritual you don’t get with Spotify. Then I’m basically forced to listen to the whole album front to back, because of the inconvenience of track skipping in that format. There is kind of a ritual to it that is a nice break from digital media. So there is a quality to the whole experience that is somewhat separate from the fidelity of the music.

      Or maybe I’m just a hipster trying to justify to myself the money I’ve spent on records lol

    • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Good stylus amp and mastering it can sound great. But really for me it’s about being in the moment and present with the music, the act of putting on a song or two at a time makes you actively listen. Like going to a concert, which is rarely the very best version of a song.

    • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Best way I’ve had it explained to me is that you’re not doing vinyl for the fidelity. You’re doing it for the vibes. Sure, CDs sound better, and streaming is more convenient, but I find it much more fun to go through the process of doing music through vinyl. Plus there’s just something about going through the effort that makes it easier for my ADHD mind to actually sit down and listen to an entire album, whereas with streaming it’s so easy to just discard a song or album and do something else instead.

    • ripcord@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I just find it really interesting.

      My house is full of dead technology like this just because I’m curious or like the aesthetics.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I tend to click around when I’m listening to digital music, it’s so easy to put on something else, skip a track, and generally fuck about.

      If I’m listening to vinyl I tend to listen to the entire album. It’s a better way of focussing my attention.