• Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I don’t know enough about the historical or medical aspects of Kuru so I’m hesitant to speak like I know anything about it.

    I suppose my main point is that there’s sometimes this unspoken assumption that the forces of “civilization” (i.e. colonialism) are the only factors keeping indigenous people from backsliding into “barbarism” (i.e. their traditions at the time of colonization, and as documented by the incredibly racist race science of that era). I detected an undercurrent of that in the original post that we’re all dunking on, and I thought that what you said about the tradition ending because of Kuru to be a really good example of how the unspoken colonial assumption is bullshit.

    To me, the foremost struggles for indigenous peoples are sovereignty and development. I think that reviving medically sketchy traditions would be pretty low on the list of priorities of most indigenous peoples and 99% of the time when it’s brought up in an internet argument it’s in bad faith.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kuru to be a really good example of how the unspoken colonial assumption is bullshit

      i mean it absolutely is bullshit, specific circumstances are always just annoyingly complicated. developments under a colonial system are real, and though inseparable from those pressures, it doesn’t make the result ungenuine or something. i’ll decry the missionaries up and down all day, but they create earnest believers, a people won’t just jump back to the old ways after being coerced to abandon them.

      the foremost struggles for indigenous peoples are sovereignty and development

      100%, cannibalism discussion is just about overturning the excuses the europeans made for colonizing