PHOENIX (AP) – The 2024 presidential election is drawing an unusually robust field of independent, third party and long shot candidates hoping to capitalize on Americans’ ambivalence and frustration over a likely rematch between Democrat Joe Biden and Republican Donald Trump.

  • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of people thinking about voting third party are going to need reasons TO vote for someone, not reasons to not vote for the other guy. Telling them “it’s just voting for Trump” isn’t going to convince them.

    And no, I’m not planning on voting third party. But finger-wagging won’t convince anyone already looking elsewhere.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If a Trump presidency doesn’t scare the shit out of them at this point, then they were already looking for excuses to support him, and “I want someone to vote FOR” is just a stupid excuse.

      Like, I want a gazillion dollars and a private island, but I also don’t smear shit on the walls of the public library when I wake up and don’t get those things. Anyone who does, just wanted to smear shit on the walls.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup. It is basically the same as how Romney and Cheney are “good republicans” because they want all the same shit trump does but want to pretend they are classier than that

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t seen Dark Brandon in a while. Like, months.

        I vote FOR Dark Brandon. I’ll give Biden my vote over Trump. Those are different things, even if the objective measure looks the same.

        I’d like to vote for DB and get him.

          • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be fair to OP, I’ve seen “Dark Brandon” more as a meme to vex conservatives, used when Biden accomplishes a one of his policies, and particularly when fighting to get student loans forgiven.

            • APassenger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This.

              Dark Brandon gets policy wins, judges in seats, he moves things. He gets funding for Ukraine.

              I haven’t seen as much of that.

              Israel isn’t something I agree as much with him on, but that’s not what I was talking about.

          • APassenger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s been a few days so this thread should largely be inert.

            I’m not sure who you were replying to because it wasn’t me.

            I said nothing about Israel. I said I’d give him my vote. Your tone was dismissive to someone who wrote what you wanted to read, but I did not say or imply.

            Not interested in a flame war, only discussion. If you respond with hostility or more bad faith, you’ll get the last word - I’ll not reply.

              • APassenger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I used a rhetorical device to easily distinguish what excites me about him being president versus what’s meh. It worked and works.

                Most people know they aren’t going to see a DB meme for the Israel topic *that you introduced from… Somewhere? *

                He’s chalked up wins and I know he’ll end up with L’s. But I prefer seeing him using his political capital on the economy, green energy, trust busting, courts… The virtuous things Roosevelts did.

                You keep implying I said something I didn’t and your post history is argumentative. Smart, but too many elbows. This will be my last reply.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anyone not terrified of a Republican and/or Trump presidency has a shitton of privilege and needs to fucking check it. Cishet, white and men are prominent demographics for “he won’t hurt me too badly” and by the time the redcaps come for those not in lockstep it’ll be far, far too late.

    • Potatofish@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, the number one reason to vote lately is to prevent Trump from pissing all over democracy. Even Republicans are joining in.

        • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re not a democracy, we’re a republic.

          Not that that’s any better, but there is a difference between the two

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            We’re not a democracy, we’re a republic.

            Things Republicans say when defending voter suppression.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you don’t want me pointing out that you’re using the same argument here that Republicans use when they’re defending voter suppression, select a different argument than the one Republicans use when they’re defending voter suppression.

                • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s not an argument, it’s a factual statement. There is no debate here. I stated the fact that we are a republic, not a democracy. Am I happy with it? No. So I support it? No.

                  It’s not an argument. It’s not a debate. It’s not a defense. It’s just a fact.

                  You interpreting this as anything else is entirely your fault.

              • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s the point of Political discussion, to grow your arguments and to learn from mistakes. It isn’t to convince someone to chance their position, that is impossible.

            • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s not blue, it’s aqua! Both are blue Karen!

              A Republic has a Consitution that separates power away from a single person.

              A true Democracy has no means of protecting against a tyrant.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “That’s not a dog, it’s a German Shepard.”

            A republic is a kind of democracy.

            • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              We need someone to stand up to Trump and protect our nation from a Tyrant. So far Joe Biden is the only individual with the titanium balls to do that. So yes, he is the only person standing between our Republic and a Christian Fascist Theocracy.

              • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Biden has spent his entire career helping build the systems that enabled someone like Trump. Biden isnt fighting fascism, he’s enabled it to happen

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In other words lots of people have an incredibly childish attitude about voting and are completely prepared to throw a little tantrum in the voting booth even if it means fascists get to take over the whole federal government. I’m becoming pretty convinced that people like that are just incapable of rational decision making.

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s crazy how people view voting. In life we have so many situations where we look at realistic options and choose the best thing, or even the least bad thing, from those options.

        But then with voting people feel like making their vote should be like wishing on a birthday cake. It’s totally irrational, as you say.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If we don’t accept that irrational people exist and do what we can to get their votes, we risk the return of Trump.

          But it’s way more fun to shout at them.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            One can’t cater to or court the irrational. We can however stop humoring them and giving them undeserved respect. That might lead more rational people to mistakenly consider them.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              One can’t cater to or court the irrational.

              Republicans keep doing it. They beat Clinton in 2016 by doing it.

              Centrist Democrats would rather lose than debase themselves by moving one Planck length to the left.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                And it’s coming back to bite them in the ass. Further, condoning and catering to those views only speeds up the rotting brain mush that is the current American political psyche. Making it easier for fascist strong men to take over. On undeliverable promises of candy mountains and soda pop swimming pools. As a socialist largely opposed to Democrats neoliberal economic plans. I can still support them, as our best current possible option. But they absolutely do need to promote themselves better.

                But Republicans have cornered the market on those who enjoy being lied to at infinitem. And it is simply not a viable tactic for democrats to even try to steal that group from them.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And it’s coming back to bite them in the ass.

                  So first it’ll never work, and now it works but it’s biting Republicans in the ass by… giving them control of the House and the Supreme Court. When you’re finally done moving goalposts, please return them.

                  As a socialist largely opposed to Democrats neoliberal economic plans. I can still support them, as our best current possible option.

                  Yeah, I can support them too. That doesn’t mean I need to shut up when I think they’re making stupid mistakes, particularly since they’re gonna blame me for the results regardless of who I vote for.

                  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes, in a long-term scope it will never work. The statements are not contradictory no matter how hard you try to imply that they are.

                    Love that straw man though. Why that’s even non sequitur. The thought process to contort from someone pointing out that they’re a socialist and disagree with Democrats. To claiming that critiquing democrats is inappropriate after immediately critiquing democrats. That’s such an odd claim that I’m inclined to ask if you were reading off the wrong script.

                    That said, in the context of presidential elections. One should NEVER consider 3rd party candidates until one of 2 things happen. First past the post voting is replaced with something better. Or said 3rd party has a presence in state or federal legislature of 10% of US states.

                    Criticize Democrats all you want. I sure do. In the meantime primary them, push them left. But don’t split the vote letting the ideal be the enemy of reality when it’s important. And it’s very important Trump never gets back in. Well important if you like even having an illusion of voting.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re at a restaurant and they don’t have anything you want, you can go to a different restaurant.

          In this case I’m tied to a chair and forced to pick a douche or a shit sandwich while people tell me I’m a bad person for not wanting either.

          • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, fuck that. A restaurant doesn’t serve cocaine-laced cupcakes that give you an orgasm, yet you still down the bacon cheeseburger because the latter tastes good and the former simply isn’t an option. Anyone who walks in and refuses to order from the menu because they can’t get a blowjob and a back massage with it, is a fucking moron.

            • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              You don’t walk in an order from the menu. You’re born in the restaurant, tied to a chair, told it’s the greatest restaurant ever created, and given two horrible choices.

              And then people like you yell at me for pointing this out.

              • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                A group of people walks into the restaurant, and you all agree to vote for a family meal so you can eat together. The choices are chicken, beef, or pork. When the rest of the group votes for chicken, and you walk out because you didn’t get what you wanted, you are the asshole.

                Don’t like it? Move the fuck somewhere else and bitch to them about how you still can’t get what you want in their electoral system. Your need for instant gratification is destroying this country.

                • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Except I don’t agree, and it’s not voluntary. I’ll be force-fed the shitty dry chicken and can’t leave or not eat it. I’d happily sit there and have the salad if they voted to have chicken, but that’s not possible here.

                  I would love to move somewhere else. Except even then the government of the US will have an influence on me. And it costs a ton of money to do that which I don’t have, in part because our government is broken as fuck.

                  And it would be awesome to have literally any gratification after 24 years of voting. Two and a half decades and the planet is still dying, education and health care are still too expensive, and the rich assholes keep getting richer at everyone else’s expense.

                  At some point I had to concede that voting will not provide any gratification at all, let alone instant gratification. I get shitty dry chicken, shitty dry pork chops, or shitty dry beef, and there’s not a damn thing I can do about it.

                  • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Oh I’m sorry. I missed the point where someone held you at gunpoint and forced you to vote for a Democrat? Because from where I sit a shitload of them got together and agreed to hold a contest. The winner made it out, and the group threw their support behind the winner against the dude the other team put up. And he won.

                    Don’t like it? Join the fucking Republicans and vote for Trump! Go ahead! He’d love to have your support! Don’t like them either? Join the Greens! Don’t like them either? Join Cornel West! Don’t like him? Join No Labels! Don’t like them? Start your own fucking political party and register as a candidate. Don’t want to do that?

                    Then sit the fuck down and let the rest of the adults in the room take care of business while you suck your thumb. There’s 80 goddamned million of us who decided Biden’s the one who checks most of our boxes, for better or worse, and those of us not stuck in la la land will vote for him again, because we’re not too keen on that whole fascist hell-hole scenario thing.

                    I’m convinced people like you have never sat in a room with more than 4 people and had to come to a consensus decision on anything. I can only assume it’s because you’ve been shoveling movie theater popcorn and were never responsible for making any meaningful decisions, or you’re a tyrannical man-child who runs a small business like a tiny little fiefdom, or you’ve never actually had a job and have spent your whole life expecting people to give you what you want. You’re probably the dude who shows up to the fried chicken restaurant and complains that they don’t serve sushi.

                    Don’t want to vote? Fucking DON’T. None of the rest of us will give a shit.

          • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            An apt analogy would be: you are diagnosed with cancer, and you can choose to (a) go through treatment and have a high chance of survival, or (b) let the cancer run its course and die.

            Voting third party in this country is equivalent to saying “I’m going to go to a faith healer instead”. You think you’re choosing a more appealing option but you’re actually just choosing option b.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        lots of people have an incredibly childish attitude about voting and are completely prepared to throw a little tantrum in the voting booth even if it means fascists get to take over the whole federal government. I’m becoming pretty convinced that people like that are just incapable of rational decision making.

        i would believe you were talking about people voting for republicans or people voting for democrats. everyone else is trying to avoid a further slide into fascism.

      • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trump might be the biggest reason to vote against him, but Republicans have played all their cards and threatened the American people’s rights. Even if he is locked up, Biden would still win.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And no, I’m not planning on voting third party. But finger-wagging won’t convince anyone already looking elsewhere.

      [finger-wagging intensifies]

    • spider@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Telling them “it’s just voting for Trump” isn’t going to convince them.

      They also use that argument against people who don’t show up to vote – the very same people who might show up for a candidate they want to vote for.

      In other words, despite conventional wisdom to the contrary, they might not vote for a two-party candidate anyway.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are people who, despite the entirety of human history, fail to take into account that people aren’t always rational. In fact, they’re deeply offended by the suggestion and become hostile towards anyone who suggests that they should take this into account, even in situations in which the consequences for failing to do so are dire.