Indictment suggests there were plans to carry out 3 killings on Canadian territory

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Cons control the newspapers. So no.

      Mr Singh could apologize or say thanks. Place your bets.

  • LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    In the view of the Indian government, North America has become a safe haven for violent separatists who are a danger to India, pointing to the Air India bombing that killed 329 people in 1985.

    Had to reach all the way back to Marty McFly for evidence, huh? Must be super dangerous violent separatists.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A newly unsealed U.S. criminal indictment has unleashed an unprecedented flood of details about an alleged plot connected to the Indian government to carry out multiple assassinations in North America.

    Perhaps the most surprising allegation in the murder-for-hire indictment filed in New York State against Indian national Nikhil Gupta is a claim that there were plans to carry out three such killings on Canadian soil.

    The indictment, made public Wednesday, accuses Gupta of attempting this year to arrange one killing in New York after receiving instructions from an Indian government employee.

    The Indian government employee is not named in the indictment, but he is described as having held different roles, including intelligence, security management and in India’s Central Reserve Police Force.

    Last week, the Financial Times reported that U.S. officials had filed a criminal indictment and thwarted a similar plot against Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, a citizen of the U.S. and Canada.

    “This is an indictment against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a known human-rights violator who has a track record of using violence to suppress criticism and dissenting political opinion,” Pannum said.


    The original article contains 832 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!