• wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Any terms of service agreement. When legally challenged, they usually do not hold up in court.

      Playstation makes you sign one that says you dont get to own the games you pay for and they can take them away whenever. A judge would likely tell them thats illegal, and they have to render services paid.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        There is a reason the “you behave like an ass, you lose access” part is not usually the one anyone challenges in court.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Lol, or I trust you can type things like “terms of service legal standing” into a search bar, and have better things to do than research something I already know for a stranger who wont read anything I find for them.

              Look through my comments. The last dipshit who played this game ghosted me after I found them 4 sources. Guaranteed, they did not read them.

              If you actually care? You can find the info. We both know you didnt care what I brought you, tho, which is why youre pretending a knock off reddit forum needs citations to be correct.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I googled it and looks like you were wrong.

                Edit: also lol at “This isn’t reddit, I can spout whatever crap I want without backing it up”

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  “the law doesnt support this when push comes to shove, judges do not side with it”

                  “Source?”

                  “If you care you can find it yourself, this is a comment section”

                  “RRRREEEEEEEEEEEEE”

                  Lol ok bud

                  • null@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Hey look, another comment with nothing even close to a defense.

                    Let’s replay this to see why what you’re saying is such obvious bullshit, shall we?

                    First you claimed that one has a “fundamental right” to access digital content they’ve “purchased” (licensed conditionally). There is no such fundamental right. You’re flat-out wrong there. Go ahead, Google it.

                    But let’s give you a little wiggle room and assume you just didn’t know what a fundamental right is. What you’re saying is that if you violate the terms of service by engaging in cheating, harassment, or sexual harassment, and the platform bans you, thereby removing your access to that content, a judge would rule against the platform and have them reinstate your access in almost every case.

                    First of all, the shift from “fundamental right” to “often” and “usually” is a pretty transparent move on your part. But that aside, you’re still just talking out of your ass. Of course there are cases where terms and conditions have been deemed to be unenforceable. But certainly not “most of the time” and definitely not in cases of obvious malicious activity.

                    Cute little reply though.