White House threatens to veto anti-EV bill just passed by US House::The bill would prevent the EPA from enforcing tougher new pollution standards.

  • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People are probably getting sick of me saying this by now, but of course Republicans aren’t doing anything, this is their philosophy. Their core beliefs are in conserving traditional hierarchies and norms. God over man, men over women and children, white over black, rich over poor, cis-het over LGBT people and other hierarchies.

    Their actions are best understood through the lens of conservative philosophy and the maintenance or restoration of socio-economic hierarchies.

    To achieve their goals, they really only need to do a few things legialativly,

    1. Stop progress and change
    2. Rollback change

    You see 1 all the time, they dont even need to be in power to do it. They just need to get in the way. If they get power, you see 2, and since they’re trying to rollback generational change, not even decades old precedent is safe (see Roe vs. Wade).

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The best part is that they got us fighting each other so much. They’ve managed to divide us across whatever line you can think of.

      All of this is a distraction. While racism and sexism absolutely exist, they fortunately aren’t the cornerstones of our hierarchies anymore. Thats great, but now we have a caste system, and nobody wants to acknowledge it.

      • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seems clear to me that my explanation covers pretty well the reasons white power groups and orthodox/conservative Christians are right wing. They aren’t the same groups, necessarily, but they both want to conserve their respective hierarchies.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can’t call them “Christians”. They are just racists with a Bible in their hand.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes and Russia and China are democracies because they said so.

              The Bible is pretty clear on racism and feeding the poor etc.

              Learn your fallacies.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s not that people disagree with you about the hypocrisy here, but rather that you’re being a real cockface about every interaction you’re having.

          • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            They are just racists with a Bible in their hand.

            I grew up in churches around religious people, you just described 99% of “Christians” in the American South.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Moses recieved the 10 commandments from Mt Sinai, notably among them being “thou shalt not kill” immediately after massacring an entire army and then immediately went to war and wiped out an entire nation in a genocide.

            And thats in the Bible.

            The only good Christian, by Christians’ own admission, was Christ himself.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not gonna defend the entire Bible here but that story was about Amalek, a specific people not humanity in general. Also they had some voodoo stuff in there about them transforming into animals. It was kinda out there.

              The water of the sea drowning the Pharaos army chasing the israelites doesn’t seem like a moral dilemma to me.

              The not killing part refers to not just killing anyone or stealing their stuff etc. Actual self defense is fine.

              You can focus on the few war stories but I know a bunch of good Christians who have adopted kids, feed the poor and do a lot of charity stuff etc. The actual good stuff.