Are you a bot?
www.raillynews.com

USA Will Invest in High-Speed ​​Train to Fight Climate Change::The USA Will Invest in High-Speed ​​Train to Fight Climate Change - US President Joe Biden announced in a speech on December 9, 2023 that they are carrying out the first high-speed train projects in US history. These projects are across America

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.worldEnglish
    615·
    11 months ago

    These projects are part of an $10 billion investment

    California’s HSR system come in at $80 billion for 520 miles, or $154 million per mile. Amtrak estimates that it would cost $500 million per mile to turn its Northeast Corridor route into a true high-speed system. source

    For $10 billion, we are talking an additional 20 to 65 miles of high speed rail to be built. This is basically nothing…

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      204·
      11 months ago

      Most of this is to fund studies and the rest is probably to cover overruns. Is it political for election season? Yes, but still a step in a positive direction. We’re not talking infrastructure week here.

      • mondoman712@lemmy.mlEnglish
        111·
        11 months ago

        There’s ~$34 million in there to study new routes. The $3 billion of this going to CAHSR will:

        • Fund six electric trains for testing and use
        • Fund design and construction of trainset facilities
        • Fund design and construction of the Fresno station
        • Fund final design and right-of-way acquisition for the Merced and the Bakersfield extensions
        • Fund construction in the Central Valley

        See https://hsr.ca.gov/2023/12/05/news-release-high-speed-rail-authority-to-receive-record-3-1-billion-from-biden-administration/

        • mean_bean279@lemmy.worldEnglish
          23·
          11 months ago

          The HSR going through the Central Valley of Cali is INSANE. the bridge and strip of it is infrastructure that area and region has legitimately never seen. I keep telling all of my friends and family here in Cali that once you can travel from Stockton to Bakersfield in 45-1 hour it’ll completely change the region. The massive economic boom from just the construction alone will be huge, but then the effect after will be felt for generation.

            • mondoman712@lemmy.mlEnglish
              201·
              11 months ago

              California receives less than it contributes to the federal government. It subsidises other states.

            • Habahnow@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              11·
              11 months ago

              Lol yeah screw the us government helping it’s citizens. Also, there has been funding for other cities to expand their public transportation.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          125·
          11 months ago

          Even better, I just hate that people are crapping all over making steps in a positive direction.

          • QuarterSwede@lemmy.worldEnglish
            62·
            11 months ago

            After decades of promises and zero high speed rails in use in the US, why believe it?

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.eeEnglish
            417·
            11 months ago

            Because it’s wasting money.

            And we seriously doubt the claimed positive impacts.

            • Habahnow@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              12·
              11 months ago

              Yeah HSR is cutting edge and unproven technology that hasn’t been successfully implemented in Europe, Japan and China.

    • qooqie@lemmy.worldEnglish
      61·
      11 months ago

      Drop in the bucket, I’m curious how much it would take to make most of the US/NA traversable by high speed rail

      • AA5B@lemmy.worldEnglish
        10·
        11 months ago

        Depends on what you mean by most.

        • most of the population is quite achievable. Send a little time at https://www.ushsr.com/
        • most of the geography, trillions, and we couldn’t afford to keep it operating

        I really think that confusing this is a common mistake. People claim high speed rail is impossible in the US because we’re big (and ignoring China, eu), but we have plenty of cities, and most of them are clustered. High speed rail is great for cities within a few hundred miles of each other. We got those, and that’s most of the population

        It’s specious to take scenarios high speed rail doesn’t do well at and claiming that it means it can’t work. Let’s apply a little intelligence here’d and use the right technology for the right scenario

    • dezmd@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      Jacksonville FL to Mobile AL is not included even though old rail and established railway right of way is already in place. Its an incomplete plan out of the gate before even looking at the realities of the funding equating to near goddamn nothing. We need real Trillion dollar funding plans at this point for high speed rail on a national level, use the long range east west/north south interstate cooridors to build over/under to connect coasts and Mexico to Canada on 4 or 5 major lines each.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.chEnglish
      49·
      11 months ago

      Think if we instead of giving trillions of dollars to the Ukraine, spent it on our own country. If we spent all that money on this project alone it might actually be beneficial to our people

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.worldEnglish
        61·
        11 months ago

        Allowing Russia to conquer our allies will hardly get us high speed rail. Furthermore, the vast majority of lethal aid for Ukraine actually pays for US industry and US jobs. Congress approves money for Javelin missile production, US contractors produce the components and assemble it, then the Javelins are sent to Ukraine to blow up Russian invaders.

        There is visual confirmation of Ukraine destroying over 13,000 Russian vehicles, including over 2,500 Russian tanks. Click the link, every single example has a picture or video detailing Russia’s devastating losses.

        • realitista@lemm.eeEnglish
          4·
          11 months ago

          Exactly.

          Allowing Russia to start conquering Europe will just mean that the US will eventually have to fight a war against Europe, China, Iran, and North Korea. If we allow it to get that far I’m sure they will recruit more countries to their axis. And then the US will have a lot worse problems than lack of high speed rail.

          I’ve been against every US military engagement in my 50 year life except this one.