• ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        na

        “obligation” - check out this word , its not big in Angloida Culture , but its important. there are certain “obligations” you have to fullfill … and when you dont … you lose “coverage” only the fullfillment of “obligation” comits the other party to fullfill its “obligation” as well. A Contract commits both Parties … Dont break it.

        • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          I disagree some obligations you are still bound by whatever the other party does. To give a microcosm argument if your wife cheats on you it’s still wrong to beat her up.

          Killing the romanovs was for the russians a sad necessity as otherwise they would have been weaponised and it was still a great wrong Nicholas and his wife less so but the kids that was actually wrong. It would have been far better to go the Puyi route or raise the children anonymously or something

          • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            "§ 241 Para. 1 BGB describes the performance obligations:

            By virtue of the obligation, the creditor is entitled to demand performance from the debtor. The performance can also consist of an omission. "

            in this case the Injured Party choose “omission” and you may have noticed , it worked very well , the Tsars have not violated any Obligation ever since.
            soviet-playful