How was The Last Jedi a rebellion against toxic fans? I thought the movie was fine and has excellent cinematography, but it wasnāt anything groundbreaking or controversial in my eyes.
the film uses certain tropes really badly. Everyone has said something about the whole āsubverting expectationsā things, and in some places, itās done well but in others, they pretty much 4th wall break. By the middle of the film, you can basically predict when and how the subversions will take place, ironically defeating the point of this trope, and ruining what could have been epic moments.
certain things flat out make zero sense. The film wants us to believe, literally spelling it out, that Poe is reckless despite his decisions up until this point being pretty good, all things considered, but wants us to consider Holdo a hero despite her causing a panic within her troops by withholding important information, and her plan ending up getting almost all of them killed.
the casino planet side part of the film feels like it should have been cut by 2/3 and it feels like the only reason for its length was so that Disney could make merchandisable figures from the animals.
itās a little too reliant on nostalgia. Or rather, when it does its nostalgia hit, the details in question usually arenāt there for any particular reason or used for anything. There are a couple of times when itās done really well, such as when R2 persuades Luke to help Rey by playing Leiaās message from A New Hope. But other times itās a random Xwing in the water or a two moons hallucination.
Poe was portrayed as being really reckless in TFA as well, though. Like his second ever appearance is stealing a star fighter in a prison break, fighting an entire star destroyer with some guy he literally just met, and then crash landing all while acting like heās on a theme park rollercoaster. His first was him intentionally getting captured in order to pull a fast one on a Sith and his entire army. Heās usually doing what needs to be done in TFA, but thatās because those situations actually required someone to do exactly what he always wants to do: fly straight at it in the fastest thing he can get his hands on and blow a bunch of stuff up. His arc in TLJ was totally in keeping with what we had already seen of him
But if his actions are necessary, by definition, thatās not recklessness. Recklessness involves a complete disregard for other, better options. If those options donāt exist, you canāt exactly call him reckless for it. Whatās the guy to do?
If he was doing that shit needlessly, thatād be one thing, but his actions in the beginning of TLJ actually improve the odds of the Rebellion considerably, even factoring in the loss of their bombers.
What he did doesnāt show that he wasnāt reckless just because it was necessary though. Iām saying he clearly wanted to do those things whether they were the right move or not, itās just fortunate for him that they were generally good moves most of the time
But thatās the thing, they were good moves at the time. That speaks far more to his experience as a pilot than his recklessness. At no point is Poe provided a safer, better option for him to disregard in favour of a risky move. So we donāt have the information needed to call him reckless, even if he has no qualms about the risky approach.
His enthusiasm for the danger made it pretty clear to me. But even then, what youāre describing is just a lack of evidence for recklessness, not evidence against him being reckless. Nothing he did in TFA suggests to me that he wouldnāt have done what he did in TLJ, itās just that in TLJ the situation didnāt work out so well for him
His enthusiasm for the danger made it pretty clear to me. But even then, what youāre describing is just a lack of evidence for recklessness
Exactly. This makes it confusing when the TLJ tries to call him reckless, because thereās been no evidence to suggest that, either in this film or the previous. The film tries to point to the bombing run as evidence, but it was clearly necessary and not an example of recklessness. An enthusiasm for danger is not the same thing as needlessly wading into it.
Nothing he did in TFA suggests to me that he wouldnāt have done what he did in TLJ, itās just that in TLJ the situation didnāt work out so well for him.
In TLJ, heās trying to prevent the entire rebellion from getting smoked by two dreadnoughts. Taking out one of them halves the firepower being aimed at them. The rebellion would have been obliterated had Poe not done what he did, Holdo maneuver or no.
and [Holdoās] plan ending up getting almost all of them killed.
Woah, hang on a second. Holdoās plan would (probably) have worked fine if she hadnāt told Poe. It was because he told Finn and Rose over a line he didnāt know was secure so he actually also told Benicio Del Toro, who then sold that info to the Discount Empire First Order that everyone died.
And then rather than punish Poe for that, she took responsibility for it, did what she could to save everyone else and sacrificed herself for the cause.
Poe incited a mutiny. Holdo made a command decision about Need To Know. I know who deserves the medal after that all dies down, and it isnāt the hotshot that had already been demoted earlier that day for disobeying orders.
Youāre 100% right about #3. And I canāt really disagree with #4 either.
God, I wanted to love this film. I still quite like it, but I canāt really bring myself to rewatch it as often as, say Rogue One. I think itās weaker in retrospect after the retcon-fest that was Rise of Skywalker, which is a shame. Rian Johnson had some great ideas that could have reinvigorated the franchise. Instead, itās barely limping on, giving us stuff like Andor as enough of a teaser that we donāt just give up on the whole thing.
In general I think there are 4 approximate groups of people when it comes to The Last Jedi. The group that really likes it (iām in this bucket). The group that thinks its a fun action movie but doesnāt push any of its interesting choices enough(you seem to be in this bucket). A group of irate star wars fans who hate it and review bombed the shit out of it. and people that dislike it because its a somewhat basic blockbuster with bad pacing. I think the existence of that third group, and at least in online spaces it isnāt remotely small, shows the movie was pushed about as far as it could be for the 8th entry in a big bucket movie franchise.
How was The Last Jedi a rebellion against toxic fans? I thought the movie was fine and has excellent cinematography, but it wasnāt anything groundbreaking or controversial in my eyes.
Itās a mixture of a few things:
the film uses certain tropes really badly. Everyone has said something about the whole āsubverting expectationsā things, and in some places, itās done well but in others, they pretty much 4th wall break. By the middle of the film, you can basically predict when and how the subversions will take place, ironically defeating the point of this trope, and ruining what could have been epic moments.
certain things flat out make zero sense. The film wants us to believe, literally spelling it out, that Poe is reckless despite his decisions up until this point being pretty good, all things considered, but wants us to consider Holdo a hero despite her causing a panic within her troops by withholding important information, and her plan ending up getting almost all of them killed.
the casino planet side part of the film feels like it should have been cut by 2/3 and it feels like the only reason for its length was so that Disney could make merchandisable figures from the animals.
itās a little too reliant on nostalgia. Or rather, when it does its nostalgia hit, the details in question usually arenāt there for any particular reason or used for anything. There are a couple of times when itās done really well, such as when R2 persuades Luke to help Rey by playing Leiaās message from A New Hope. But other times itās a random Xwing in the water or a two moons hallucination.
Poe was portrayed as being really reckless in TFA as well, though. Like his second ever appearance is stealing a star fighter in a prison break, fighting an entire star destroyer with some guy he literally just met, and then crash landing all while acting like heās on a theme park rollercoaster. His first was him intentionally getting captured in order to pull a fast one on a Sith and his entire army. Heās usually doing what needs to be done in TFA, but thatās because those situations actually required someone to do exactly what he always wants to do: fly straight at it in the fastest thing he can get his hands on and blow a bunch of stuff up. His arc in TLJ was totally in keeping with what we had already seen of him
But if his actions are necessary, by definition, thatās not recklessness. Recklessness involves a complete disregard for other, better options. If those options donāt exist, you canāt exactly call him reckless for it. Whatās the guy to do?
If he was doing that shit needlessly, thatād be one thing, but his actions in the beginning of TLJ actually improve the odds of the Rebellion considerably, even factoring in the loss of their bombers.
Poe was a pure good aligned Han Solo.
What he did doesnāt show that he wasnāt reckless just because it was necessary though. Iām saying he clearly wanted to do those things whether they were the right move or not, itās just fortunate for him that they were generally good moves most of the time
But thatās the thing, they were good moves at the time. That speaks far more to his experience as a pilot than his recklessness. At no point is Poe provided a safer, better option for him to disregard in favour of a risky move. So we donāt have the information needed to call him reckless, even if he has no qualms about the risky approach.
His enthusiasm for the danger made it pretty clear to me. But even then, what youāre describing is just a lack of evidence for recklessness, not evidence against him being reckless. Nothing he did in TFA suggests to me that he wouldnāt have done what he did in TLJ, itās just that in TLJ the situation didnāt work out so well for him
Exactly. This makes it confusing when the TLJ tries to call him reckless, because thereās been no evidence to suggest that, either in this film or the previous. The film tries to point to the bombing run as evidence, but it was clearly necessary and not an example of recklessness. An enthusiasm for danger is not the same thing as needlessly wading into it.
In TLJ, heās trying to prevent the entire rebellion from getting smoked by two dreadnoughts. Taking out one of them halves the firepower being aimed at them. The rebellion would have been obliterated had Poe not done what he did, Holdo maneuver or no.
Woah, hang on a second. Holdoās plan would (probably) have worked fine if she hadnāt told Poe. It was because he told Finn and Rose over a line he didnāt know was secure so he actually also told Benicio Del Toro, who then sold that info to the
Discount EmpireFirst Order that everyone died.And then rather than punish Poe for that, she took responsibility for it, did what she could to save everyone else and sacrificed herself for the cause.
Poe incited a mutiny. Holdo made a command decision about Need To Know. I know who deserves the medal after that all dies down, and it isnāt the hotshot that had already been demoted earlier that day for disobeying orders.
Youāre 100% right about #3. And I canāt really disagree with #4 either.
God, I wanted to love this film. I still quite like it, but I canāt really bring myself to rewatch it as often as, say Rogue One. I think itās weaker in retrospect after the retcon-fest that was Rise of Skywalker, which is a shame. Rian Johnson had some great ideas that could have reinvigorated the franchise. Instead, itās barely limping on, giving us stuff like Andor as enough of a teaser that we donāt just give up on the whole thing.
In general I think there are 4 approximate groups of people when it comes to The Last Jedi. The group that really likes it (iām in this bucket). The group that thinks its a fun action movie but doesnāt push any of its interesting choices enough(you seem to be in this bucket). A group of irate star wars fans who hate it and review bombed the shit out of it. and people that dislike it because its a somewhat basic blockbuster with bad pacing. I think the existence of that third group, and at least in online spaces it isnāt remotely small, shows the movie was pushed about as far as it could be for the 8th entry in a big bucket movie franchise.
I guess Iām the fourth. I canāt say that I liked the movie, but imo it got more hate than it deserved and itās the best of the trilogy