• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    FFS, Weed doesn’t affect anyone who doesn’t choose to be affected. It doesn’t even need to be smoked. Ever hear the term “nanny state”?

    I don’t know what point you’re trying to make but if you honestly can’t understand the difference between a victimless crime and a real crime, I can’t communicate with you on this topic.

    • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Driving through red lights doesn’t affect anyone either than. I make it through the intersection, nobody gets hurt and everybody gets what they want. We’re arguing same thing. Both are victimless crimes.

      • 9bananas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        you are NOT arguing the same thing:

        • you making it through an intersection at a red light requires luck. you need to get lucky, every time, or someone fucking dies. a dead person is a fucking victim, therefore it’s not a “victimless crime”

        • weed can’t kill you. that’s why it’s a victimless crime. in extremely rare cases it can cause mental health problems, but only in the person taking it.

        the difference is that in one case YOU are responsible for harming someone else, in the other case they did it to themselves AND it’s extremely rare AND it’s not based on random luck.

        these situations are not even close to being the same thing.