I bought a Spanish textbook recently and it uses multiple fonts throughout for this exact reason. I hadn’t seen in it in a physical book before but if it helps people I’m all for it.
It’s not about me lol, this is a fundamental criterion for a good font, a font that doesn’t differentiate between glyphs is objectively a bad font, it is bad at the ONE SINGLE JOB it has.
It can even help with attention-focussing issues like in ADHD. Marvelous invention, really.
I bought a Spanish textbook recently and it uses multiple fonts throughout for this exact reason. I hadn’t seen in it in a physical book before but if it helps people I’m all for it.
Ironically i find it vastly more difficult to focus on than normal fonts, all i want is to FUCKING MAKE GLYPHS LOOK DIFFERENT TO EACH OTHER
iIlL| if these don’t look OBVIOUSLY different in a font it is a bad font and must die.
Is this loss?
Look up “Atkinson Hyperlegible”
Yeah i read another comment about it and tried it, seems to let me read without my glasses!
https://brailleinstitute.org/freefont for the curious but lazy
Yes, things that aren’t designed for you should die, I feel the same
It’s not about me lol, this is a fundamental criterion for a good font, a font that doesn’t differentiate between glyphs is objectively a bad font, it is bad at the ONE SINGLE JOB it has.
Its job is to help people with dyslexia, and it does, even if it doesn’t help everyone with dyslexia