• CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s generally how it’s been done in America for hundreds of years. I think peasants in Europe did it like that even further back too. So how long until it can be considered “tradition”?

            • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Rich families married for power, peasants married for love. That’s pretty much how it’s always been. Lmao do you think people who worked on a lords farm was also worrying about who their daughter could marry to get a leg up? That’s ridiculous

              • andxz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                From the University of Nottingham:

                People from land-owning families did not normally marry for love. Instead, most such marriages were arranged by their parents or guardians.

                Arranged marriages remain an important part of the culture of many societies in the world today, for the same implicit reasons that probably motivated medieval English people: for the creation of stable family units based on respect and duty, in which love can grow; and to protect and increase the family’s wealth and status by association with another family of equal or higher repute.

                Peasant women who did not own any land were not exempt from some kind of control over their marriage, as many manorial lords demanded payment of a sum of money called a ‘merchet’

                https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/manuscriptsandspecialcollections/learning/medievalwomen/theme5/marriagearrangements.aspx

                There are plenty of examples, both rich and poor, if you scroll down.

              • GregorGizeh
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                If you think peasants married for just love and not because their father promised them to the son of a farmer they have dealings with, or to a businessman who can provide well for her, or to elevate the family standing in some other way, I have bad news.

                Even to this day, after all the strides for equality of the sexes is the material wealth of a man a substantial factor in choosing a partner for most women, even if they are plenty able to provide for themselves.

                • andxz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I agree with you, as stated above, but I have to mention that my wonderful wife more or less picked (for reasons I never understood) me up from homelessness and debt and has cared for me for the past 15 years. I guess these days I’m almost domesticated, even.

                • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I didn’t say “just for love” but it did happen. None of this information provided contradicts my point that traditionally people have sex with people they like. That has been the case for a while now, back to my original question, how long until you would consider it tradition? 100 years seems enough to me