• Resethel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, public transport is the most viable solution for the masses, but that also mean taking money out of the ends of firms (subsidies, infrastructure, etc.), which is not gonna happen without re-thinking our economy

    • ydieb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. The more efficient the public transport is, the more money will circulate to firms. So not doing it costs more.

      • Resethel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sure it will be beneficial for many industries but I’d argue that it will severely impact (in a positive way) the transport industry, and the oil and gas industry as well. Since they have the strongest lobbying force, it’s going to be quite hard to go against them.

        Moreover, it may upset the distribution chains e.g., it might be hard to do « right-on-time » stock management when waiting for a train to be fully loaded before chipping, etc.

        In my opinion, money will circulate better, but to the detriment of those big industry, hence why it’s so hard for politicians to act on it.

        • ydieb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So some big companies that deserve no pity will earn less. Will they be opposed to it, of course, but that does not change anything of what we should push for.

          How hard it is to implement is an entirely different discussion though.