• FireTower@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I couldn’t find a source with enough details on this picture to confidently say. It might just be a blast can.

      • FireTower@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        It makes sense that they’d favor the .38s if they wanted to suppress them as a gunsmith can convert a non threaded revolver into one easier than they could with a 1911 (assuming they didn’t have threaded 1911 barrels at hand).

        I can’t imagine the horror of being in a tunnel that’s effectively a trapped enemy base blinded, deafened, and having alerted everyone to your presence.

        Also for anyone unfamiliar with what I meant above by blast can here’s a picture. I realized that outside of the US commercial market they may be fairly unknown. They have no baffles and only direct the blast forward. Which could be handy in a tunnel.

        • SSTF@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I just now linked a report in another comment, the silencer is part of the 1966 experimental kit, and it was found to be largely ineffective.

          If there is any reason for bias towards a revolver over a 1911, I suspect a more plausible explanation either in absolute fact or in perception is that a Brown style action like in a 1911 can be pushed out of battery and made inoperable if the barrel is pushed on. It isn’t normally a concern, but you can imagine why a tunnel rat might worry about it. That is just speculation.