• parpol@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Since the context is Hatsune Miku being a loli, and the only childlike traits she has being small tits (sometimes), I used it as an example.

    But also, there is no absolute definition of what a loli is. Being short and flatchested is enough for some to label the character a loli, even if said character is an adult. And a character can be in middle school but still not be considered a loli. The actual age of the character is not generally important in labelling the character a loli. It is a body type.

    • Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Ah so we’re going with the “there’s no clear definition” argument. I know you know what I mean because no one takes the time to say:

      “Nowadays people will call you a pedophile on extwitter for liking an image of a clothed Hatsune Miku.”

      You know what I’m talking about because no one would care if you said a character like Kiyomi Takada from Death Note was clothed or not. But you made it crystal clear that you meant clothed because there would be something very wrong otherwise. You can have the last word if you want man, all of you guys are just making excuses for yourselves.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I added clothed because it adds to the absurdity. Hatsune Miku to begin with is not a loli, and there is nothing wrong with feeling sexual attraction towards her.

        For someone to see her and think “pedophiles jerk off to this” on top of for some reason feeling the need to sexualize her despite her being clothed is the weird shit you see on extwitter.