SomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agoYou probably don’t need a masters degree to debunk this one.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square255fedilinkarrow-up1545arrow-down119
arrow-up1526arrow-down1imageYou probably don’t need a masters degree to debunk this one.lemmy.worldSomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square255fedilink
minus-squarevoidavoid@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoNot unlike how some media is working on presenting the fediverse as a singular organization. It’s as if some can’t conceive of humans organizing without a corporate overseer.
minus-squareNoughmad@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year ago“Who is this four chan?” They really can’t. Anonymous was something that corporate media simply couldn’t explain.
minus-squareMeowoem@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoOh they’d have been able to explain it if it benefitted the rich for people to understand it…
minus-squarefsxylo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI’m so happy I stopped paying attention to mainstream media.
minus-squareRobaque@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoHow will the masses be good lil subordinates once they realise they hold the true power?
Not unlike how some media is working on presenting the fediverse as a singular organization.
It’s as if some can’t conceive of humans organizing without a corporate overseer.
“Who is this four chan?”
They really can’t. Anonymous was something that corporate media simply couldn’t explain.
Oh they’d have been able to explain it if it benefitted the rich for people to understand it…
I’m so happy I stopped paying attention to mainstream media.
How will the masses be good lil subordinates once they realise they hold the true power?