• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a shame that no matter the amount of outrage, no matter what the pitfalls of this change may be, it’s going to happen no matter what because money.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what I read in the related links they only claim to have applied pressure, they didn’t cave because of that pressure though. Again it seemed to be about money.

        “The only saving grace was Vista’s very painful and long development period where Palladium was eventually killed so Vista could actually ship.”

    • what_is_a_name@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Luckily we have choices. From WebKit browsers to Mozilla browsers. This will make me quite chrome. (Way overdue anyways)

      • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you switch to a browser that cannot be remotely attested, eventually commercial websites will just stop serving you. So switch now and tell everyone you know to switch to something that is not Chrome.

        Safari already does this in the form of Personal Access Tokens, and the reason the web hasn’t taken it an ran with it yet is because their market share is ~20%. Chrome is 70%. This is about to be a systemic problem that you cannot fix by switching to software that respects your freedom.