- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Kristen Browde has amassed over 380,000 followers on TikTok by debunking the anti-LGBTQ+ “groomer” myth, and no one is more shocked by her success on the platform than she is. “TikTok is supposed to be this app where teenagers do dance moves, but it turns out it’s an incredibly effective political organizing tool,” she tells Them in an interview. “I am delighted that people are finding this useful information and are sharing it.”
Browde, an attorney and former correspondent for CBS News, posts weekly videos aggregating local media reports of children being targeted by sexual predators, sourced from keyword searches on Google and DuckDuckGo, as well as tips from followers. (She posts all her data at her website WhoIsMakingNews.com, where it’s available for anyone to download.) In the six months since she created her first TikTok video, she has noticed a continuing trend: that very few of the perpetrators who are being arrested for preying on kids are drag queens or trans people, the targets du jour of the right. Instead, Browde found that the individuals who are responsible for the vast majority of reported incidents hail from the very groups pointing the finger at the LGBTQ+ community, from religious leaders to Republican politicians. “They’re the ones who are committing the crimes,” she says. “They’re the ones who are doing this.”
She’s right, TikTok is an effective political organizing tool. I resisted it until recently, because I’m an elder millennial and jaded on social media, but when I left Reddit I finally checked it out, and it’s really something else. I’m sure I could see stupid dances if I wanted to, but I haven’t seen one yet. What I have seen, is dozens of hours of lectures from amazing minds, permaculture communities sharing massive amounts of knowledge, protests formed spontaneously that grow to large numbers… it’s a damn good site.
Interesting, I have a similar mindset to what you had, do you have any suggestions for creators or accounts which you find particularly worthwhile?
@africanstream is good for getting an anti-colonial perspective on African issues from the African perspective, which is so refreshing after decades of reading Western takes, which are always so paternalistic and propagandized.
@richard_wolff posts a lot, and I like to use his videos to share with people, because he does a great job of explaining highly complex topics in ways that are understandable without having an academic background.
@scientist.rebellion_ is doing good work documenting scientists and activists discussing the failure of states to take any effective action against climate change, as well as documenting the abuses of scientists by states worldwide for protesting.
@transformativeadventures has been super helpful in getting me started in permaculture, not only what he says, but also even things like (the pictures in the background of his videos can be used to find further resources and knowledge. I’ve gotten 10 pages of notes off his channel in the last two days this way. Sorry, idk why it got cut off and I’m not sure what exactly I had before, but I noticed that sentence just sorta… ended.)
Mostly I just follow hashtags though.
What hashtags if you don’t mind sharing?
Union, abolition, socialism, communism, anarchism, solidarity, Africa, Marx, Marxist, anarchist, permaculture, sustainable, feminism, anticapitalism, leftisttiktok, lefttiktok, davidgraeber, Graeber, mutualaid, protest, directaction, and a bunch more I can’t think of now.
@jrehwald15 is based as hell.
It’s all just short form videos though right?
90+%. You can do longer form content, but it’s not very common. Playlists are often used to chain multiple short videos together into something longer.
I’m not saying it can’t be good for those things, but I don’t think it can be that good at them. Besides quick insults or pointing out issues, it is not conducive to discussion or analysis. It can be a few seconds that can get you interested in something, but it can’t get you past that point. You’ll have to go to another platform. Most lectures or political analyses require at least 15-30m, if not much longer.
TikTok is a platform that is required to be devoid of context because you don’t have time to include it. I’m not a fan. It might be useful for outreach, but it will never be useful for creating actual understanding. It’ll only breed the Dunning Kruger effect where people hear about something and think they actually know anything about it.
I feel that. You can have videos longer than 10m, and with playlists I’ve watched hour long content, but short bites are definitely the norm. 2-3m I’d say. It doesn’t leave much room for discussion either, as you said. It’s most useful for getting information out to a large group of people, quickly, that otherwise might be missed by many of those people. Great for basic concepts, and beginner courses, info dumps and calls to action, but I definitely don’t enter the comments often for a reason.
But that short time and ease of access gives it power too. It’s a great way to get to people when they’re otherwise too caught up for anything longer, like workers on breaks, who are most atomized, and most in need of agitation and education. If you can sow the seeds of understanding, and get people to want to learn more on their own, and provide decent resources to do so, you can help a lot of people. That’s when I use it, and I’ve been able to show coworkers videos I’ve seen because they use TikTok and they’re interested in what I’m watching, and then it opens a conversation path that otherwise would’ve been uncomfortable to broach.