• steakmeout@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s literally a tech company. The laws the company tests are all about the impact of tech.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The laws the company tests are all about the impact of tech.

        This could be said of any large multinational.

        BHP is a multinational mining company worth 4x twitter which tests laws around the impact of tech. If they wanted to re-brand would that be tech news ?

        • steakmeout@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. And when BHP tests laws in ways that are newsworthy people can discuss them here. The disconnect in your logic is hilarious.

      • daYMAN007@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are not sellung technology. If i could buy a license to run twitter on my server then you would be correct.

        Twitter is a socialmedia company . Just as uber is rideshare company

        • steakmeout@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In your mind a company has to sell tech to be a tech company. Is Google a tech company? Were they not a tech company when they developed a sorting algorithm for the web? Were they not a tech company when they started spelling targeted advertising based on that algorithm? Of they were and are.