Name one part of that hearing that was significant, because not only did he not have any evidence, he didn’t have any evidence that there is evidence. I watched it and frankly I want my time back.
The members of Congress who participated in this should be embarrassed they paraded this nonsense around. Nothing new was learned. I promise you we have heard nothing of value and we won’t later. If there is real info about it this is not the pipeline that information is flowing down.
Name one part of that hearing that was significant, because not only did he not have any evidence, he didn’t have any evidence that there is evidence. I watched it and frankly I want my time back.
Yes a person specifically employed to find information who then reports said information is 100% the same as dumb shit you said on a playground.
Exactly the same.
Nothing in that hearing says otherwise
You have definitely not seen the hearing
Huh
The evidence and witness info provided have the committee members calling for a select committee with subpoena powers.
When Grusch said “I can’t say that here” that was never going to be the end of that discussion
Huh
A select committee is not “every committee by default.” A select committee is a specific committee.
Also you may want to revisit the last sentence of paragraph 1.
And no, the entire hearing was credible.
Frankly if it’s nothing, you don’t have to give a shit. The members of Congress think it’s something, and I agree with them.
The members of Congress who participated in this should be embarrassed they paraded this nonsense around. Nothing new was learned. I promise you we have heard nothing of value and we won’t later. If there is real info about it this is not the pipeline that information is flowing down.