According to a summary of the bill released by the Patriotic Millionaires—an advocacy group that helped craft the measure—the wealth tax would have four brackets:

  • 2% for all wealth between 1,000 and 10,000 times median household wealth;
  • 4% for all wealth between 10,000 and 100,000 times median household wealth;
  • 6% for all wealth between 100,000 and 1,000,000 times median household wealth; and
  • 8% for all wealth over 1,000,000 times median household wealth;

"In the unlikely event median household wealth fell below $50,000 from its current level of about $120,000, the thresholds would be fixed at $50 million, $500 million, $5 billion, and $50 billion respectively.”

The legislation would also require at least a 30% IRS audit rate on households affected by the new wealth tax.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wealth taxes are super easy to avoid, so I’d much rather see something like cap gains+“luxury” sales/income taxes and such, but it’s a step in the right direction

    Now raise taxes on everyone making over 100k and we’re really cooking with gas

    • MisterCreamyShits@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      $100k aint that much and those people already have a heafty tax burden. Plus luxury taxes are easily avoided when yachts and planes are purchased in the Bahamas. What we need are 50% taxes on the money they borrow against their assets. Want to buy another mansion? Cool 50% tax on the money Goldman Sachs lends you against your Amazon stock. If I have to pay a tax to borrow against my 401k so should these assholes.

        • MisterCreamyShits@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          $100k is a bad metric because somebody making $100k in the Bay Are or New York is basically in poverty. I make over $100k and I’m not well off at all. Not even close. And I’m not bad with money, have zero debt, save 15% in the 401k no kids and still things are tight.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah federal taxation doesn’t work based on “I should be able to put 15% into my 401(k) and live where I want.”

            $100k is not basically poverty in LA/NY or everyone making under $100k would be below poverty and that’s more than half the population (median household income - that is, generally 2 working adults - of 68k in NYC, and NYC is more expensive than LA).

        • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Warren Buffett doesn’t pay income tax because he doesn’t earn income.

          The billionaires don’t have a billion in cash, they don’t earn a billion dollars a year. They hold assets worth that much.

          Taxing wealth is the only way to combat the wealth gap.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            First off you’ll need to define “combat the wealth gap.” Difference between high and low isn’t really a relevant thing.

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      But income tax on paper is already higher for the $100k tax bracket than what the ultra rich pay. The ultra rich do everything in their power to not have an “income”. Hence why there’s this effort of taxing wealth instead.

        • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The cap gains tax that the richest people in the world never end up paying?

          https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax

          From 2014-2018 Warren Buffet alone grew his personal wealth by 24.3B, reported 125M in income (0.51% of wealth), and paid 23.7M in taxes (0.1% of wealth). Over 4 years, this man paid taxes on a tenth of a percent of his income. Similar tax numbers under 5% apply for other billionaires.

          The ultra rich never pay capital gains tax, loopholes allow them to have their income in portfolios, which isn’t taxed. Capital gains is only for realized gains. When your portfolio is worth billions, you don’t need to sell it to have spending money, you can take a loan against the value of portfolio.

          Capital gains tax only affects those who don’t have a bank’s worth of money in their portfolio.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            My post was specifically that we should increase amount paid via cap gains so I’m not sure where you’re going here

            These are laws we’ve written, not magic. We can change them

            Edit: also wealth taxes, historically, are among the easiest to avoid via accounting, and the hardest to “fix” as laws

            • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              My point is that increasing the amount paid via cap gains does absolutely nothing if the mega rich don’t need to pay it in the first place.