• xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So you’re just doubling down on jury duty is slavery instead of considering a nuanced perspective?

        Edit: autocorrect

        • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          im assuming you mean nuanced

          me not agreeing with you doesnt mean i didnt consider your perspective, and saying ‘well surely not all forced labour is slavery’ isnt nuance

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The issue is you’re confusing compulsory labour with forced labour.

            If you don’t do conscription or civil service work (the alternative option) the consequences are a fine, or jail. This is the same as eg refusing jury duty or not doing your taxes.

            Having compulsory civil duties is not new, nor is it slavery. In countries at high risk of conflict (eg Taiwan), it’s practically required for their continued short-term existence.

            I’m not even pro-conscription (for my own nation at this time), but “conscription is slavery” is so reductive, and just stops people discussing the actual pros and cons of the practice.

            • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The issue is you’re confusing compulsory labour with forced labour.

              seems like a you problem, what with you talking about compulsory labour while i explicitly said forced labour

              If you don’t do conscription or civil service work (the alternative option) the consequences are a fine, or jail.

              “youre not forced to do it, you just get tossed in jail if you dont do it”

              In countries at high risk of conflict (eg Taiwan), it’s practically required for their continued short-term existence.

              if a country can only motivate its people to actually protect said country by threatening them into doing so, it didnt actually deserve protection

              and just stops people discussing the actual pros and cons of the practice.

              good, i do not want people discussing the actual pros of slavery